Basketball Cupcake Pull Apart Cake

As in Europe, the civil rights abolished

WikiLeaks: Free travel for arbitrariness - How are placed in the case of Julian Assange civil rights suspended

Udo Ulfkotte

If you have read the following lines, then you can convince themselves that Julian is currently not in Europe Assange treated differently from human rights in China or Burma. But unlike in the case of imprisoned civil rights in distant countries, we look at all Assange how the rule of law in Europe is a farce. The persecution and disenfranchisement of the Australian WikiLeaks-founder in Europe is above all a test case of how serious European politicians are still with civil rights. Assange was indeed arrested at the request of the Swedish prosecutor with the valid since 2002, the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) in Great Britain. But this EAW is now one of the most dangerous tools in order to silence unpopular people in Europe or have even disappeared in cells - even if the persons concerned have never committed a crime.

All over Europe people are being prosecuted - just because they support WikiLeaks founder Assange. For those who come to the attention of the police, it is not just the one the websites of Amazon, Mastercard and other companies have made the Internet with DOS attacks temporarily inaccessible. It extends to information available to us from security sources in Brussels now, having set up a Google Alert for Julian Assange or WikiLeaks to get the attention of the European security authorities and should be considered as potentially "suspicious." To avoid misunderstanding: No one claims that there will be against the background of Google Alerts an arrest or search warrant. But those who have set up such an alert will certainly not suspect that their interest is just saved automatically to the security authorities and is known (regardless of Google's participation). This development is part of the degradation of civil rights in Europe, which is simply not perceived by many.

On closer inspection this is all more than questionable, as familiar to citizens of European law can be undermined quickly legal. This proves the "Julian Assange case." Assange was arrested in Britain for a "crime" that in Britain - unlike in Sweden - not a crime: sex without a condom. The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) will open in Europe since 2002, the arbitrariness of the door. There is no legal review of the EAW in the alleged criminal acts. Worse: An EU citizen can arrest and be extradited to another EU country, even if the alleged offense, where he was arrested, is no crime. The EAW leads to absurd situations: As EU citizens can be arrested because they have such as the Internet critical of immigrants who commit often in the EU than EU citizens certain ethnic crimes. Who for instance, in Austria or Germany on the Internet on crime by immigrants is expressed, which can be for example in Sweden wanted for arrest because of "racism" - and suddenly the police arrive at the door and delivers the person without a judicial examination of the case in Sweden .

Imagine, it rings at your door and arresting police officers with an EAW because it was ten years in another EU country once their accounts are overdrawn. A joke? No, not at all. Jacek Jaskolski is a 58-year-old high school teacher of Polish descent who has been teaching since 2004 at a British university. In 2008 he was arrested in London because he was a decade previously coated with a stay in his old Polish home had an account. In Poland this is a criminal offense and is prosecuted in the UK are interested in possibly civil courts for that. Although Jacek Jaskolski had balanced the account has long been covered again, he was by EAW arrested and transferred to Poland. More than a thousand Poles are arrested per year in other EU countries with an EAW and delivered to their home country because they then eventually have their account overdrawn. Each year, Poland will accept in other EU countries to arrest about 5,000 citizens for "crimes". Most of these cases were prosecuted in any other EU country. According to British newspapers, the cases in which an EAW is issued in Europe more bizarre: A 16-year-old teenager was searched by EAW warrant because he had paid in a restaurant but the meal, but not the subsequently filed dessert. The EAW was then detail all the substances and their Value listed, which were contained in the pudding. The boy was flown in specially for the transfer of offenders chartered plane from London to his home in the process - British police were stunned not only about the money.

is more often used, however, the EWA is to make silence politically unpopular people for a longer period. Julian Assange is not unique. Many media do not seem the slightest knowledge of the EAW to have to win by a further instrument of arbitrary additional field: the European determining arrangement in criminal matters (EEW). This example also includes an EU-wide search and seizure decision. Each EU country can use the police in another EU country to order in another EU country - to have carried out a house search or seizure - without any judicial checks. This regulation (European Evidence Warrant - EEW) is his January 2009 entered into force and has introduced until January 2011 in all EU countries. Each local police department, a judge in an EU country, every attorney and every law enforcement agency may issue such a European search and seizure decision (2008/978/JHA EU decision of 18 December 2008) in another EU country. As with the European arrest warrant check the relevant EU country no longer the legality of the decision, but simply out of this. It is a sure-fire system to destroy unwanted people quickly - because they can fight back, however until the measures have been completed and they may have been transferred to another EU country. In the case of Julian Assange we have seen, can have far-reaching consequences of what these measures.

The Swedes, meanwhile, has caught on once to prepare for the delivery of the Australian citizen Julian Assange to the U.S.. This is only the consent of the British. In Sweden against WikiLeaks founder investigating prosecutor, Marianne Ny, announced in a press release, the British would have to agree before Assange can now be delivered quickly to the U.S.. So it's certainly not right and certainly not about an alleged rape - it's just a matter of making a people ready. But that is the farce of a law. Europe has given up. If you are interested in further background of this development, then you look around the rest to our information service.

They are then quickly find what you withhold the "quality media" of information. Those who, like Hans Leyendecker (the man was once renowned as an investigative journalist for the Süddeutsche Zeitung) these days clearly against WikiLeaks position and its founder Assange are currently clearly eaten up by envy because they do not get, but other information, views, and may publish. Leyendecker people like to talk much, "of" conspiracy theory to discredit what they themselves do not get either of information or understanding to interpret. People like Leyendecker would do well to retire to withdraw. Or they are at last and defend political prisoners as Assange. Otherwise "quality journalists share" as Leyendecker once again a clear sign of why they are in today's increasingly redundant and one of the "quality media" should be located where they belong: in the paper.

Animated Wallpaper Vlc

priority order in the gender equality offices

on feminism and women's true stories

By Barbara Steinemann, State Councillor SVP, Watt ZH

Periodically publish the Gender Equality Bureau of the Federation, the cantons and the cities of its information brochures. The one devoted to three-quarters of its pages to the school leavers, where teaching is made more palatable in a typically male-dominated profession.

"Break the traditional gender structures on! Learn a man's job! "These calls are accompanied by a portrait painter and a lot of arguments with All kinds of colorful emancipation. Frankly: The thought of a fringe group of the same sex are to me as a reader almost embarrassing, our society it is probably a little too well.

girls and women appear there as the "stupid sex," which state agencies must have for every situation his way. If we women about being left behind? Do we need a tutor? Or do the same work-site channels simply do not know what to do with their time and their ample public funds?

Islamic oppression

In our neighbor-dominated culture, the exact opposite. The oppression of women achieved in Arabia and Africa new dimensions. The recent reports by the UN to speak of emerging "gender apartheid". The South Africa of today with veil. The new victims are placed in dark clothes and stigmatized beyond recognition. Barbaric punishments and rituals, from stoning circumcisions accumulate again in the Islamic world. Girls are not worth anything, it counts more than their retail value as a bride. Women awaiting execution by stoning for adultery. The case of convicted Khayrieh in Iran has attracted international interest when her pleas were announced publicly: "I am ready to be hanged, but they should not stone me!"

Today waits Sakineh Ashtiani for months in the same country for their stoning, allegedly had contact with the widow of two men. For this she was sentenced only to 99 lashes, which punishment has been enforced.

"right" or even "justice" in these worlds are no individual claims of the individual against society and the authorities. Meanwhile, we should always be aware. So the woman will be killed, simply because they can defend themselves as a woman at the worst, however. The mystery of this injustice should draw us into its spell, not the agenda of our gender equality offices.

The West, however, is silent. In Saudi Arabia, women are hardly treated better than Camels. They may not have a passport or driving a car, they are education, occupation, deprived of even public spaces - just like the blacks in South Africa.

defend anyone but themselves? Greenpeace thinks about the whales, the Green Party to climate change, the feminists of the female apprentices in male professions. To protest against, may be as idle as the world history of the omissions. Nevertheless, if the dozen dictatorships withdraw the women's human rights is demonstrated by the systematic Looking away from indifference, fear and indifference.

And us?

want to Western Europe, immigrant Muslim women here all too often under the Yoke of their men. All too often - in fact locked in her own apartment - they are at the mercy of hard violence, many have become victims of forced marriages, the starting point for a non-free life predicament.

Where is the outcry of women's rights organizations? Find it breathtaking to equal opportunity office, the language? One in the Middle Ages left standing "culture" makes in this country wide, gender defamation already impressed the external appearance - in the form of more or less of the concealment of the body. The Equal Opportunity Office look away. Admittedly, it's also easier to brand Swiss men as bearded tyrant to correctly state.

Muslim-specific issues can be explained away so little: Other in Switzerland could ask the questions we raised last year by the initiative. You have not done it until now. Before you say loose flaky and chumming, Islam is a part of Germany, one should look at the disgusting facts that take place in Muslim areas in the eye and raise this open. Violence damages the image of Islam. And as long as the Muslims who live here do not distance themselves from such atrocities of Islam, they did not arrive in our democracy.

priority order

An ethnic discrimination all around us far from it. We do not draw the line between Muslims and all others, but we draw the line between those who live by the rules of the liberal constitutional state and those which adhere to the archaic doctrine of a backward tradition. We have always done and do it in the future. The population of Switzerland has also seen this so, otherwise they would not have voted Yes a year ago.

While breaking the women's representatives and equal opportunity offices in Switzerland, the head every day about how the women have something similar could be made and in which administrative body or to set up a women's representative expert body would be immigrants from areas greater distance and suppresses even greater cultural distance in the middle of Europe systematically.

particular, feminists and those political groups which take the matter of women, human rights, violence against the weak and ignore social issues, precisely the phenomena of Islam, which they usually fight with verve. That just to support the advance of Islam in Europe mocks any reason. The refusal of Western freedoms for Muslim women met a key condition for the winning ground human rights obligations, parallel societies. Misogyny occurs in migrants to apply the multi-cultural tolerance bid, say critics ban. Although these are to foreigners!

The most terrible human rights abuses on our planet are the local women's offices not worth a single line. The website of the Equal Opportunity Office of the City of Zurich instead lets us know that this year the prize of twenty thousand francs Diversity Award to the association "Women City Tour Zurich" will be directed. The city of Bern wants to reduce gender-based discrimination with a new action plan "a city without advertising sexist motives" prevail. This is expressed, according to what priority order, the same place gutters treat women fates ...

The migrant backgrounds are Official bodies such taboo, because reality does not fit into the ideological concept of multiculturalism. In order to accept the gender equality offices, not only thought control, they tolerate severe pain that is done to other women.

Barbara Steinemann

Polaroid 600 Film Substitutefujifilm Instax

No Islamization of Switzerland!

passive response to Federal
manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland"
National Ulrich Schlüer, Flaach, ZH

On 29 November 2009, decided the People and the minaret ban with a clear majority. For one year from the Federal Council is expected opinion of how they will implement that referendum. Three times required advances, and events such comments. Three times more The Federal Council.

a written reply to interpellation would eliminate any obligation of the Federal Council, as he had them put in order-handling in the mass on the agenda of the special session on crime reduction. When the interpellators resist the attempt disposal, they simply disappeared from the agenda.

facts

The action brought by Geneva Muslims to the European Court of Human Rights for the purpose of the cancellation broke the Swiss referendum on minaret ban and a solicitation from the Federal Council. This doubted but on procedural grounds the jurisdiction of Strasbourg. The Federal Council but avoided any assertion that according to Swiss constitutional law, no court of a decision of the Swiss sovereign has the right to overturn. Instead, signals the Federal unconstitutional willingness to continue not only Swiss law, but also provisions of the Federal Constitution as subordinate to international law to be classified. For such a devaluation of the Federal Constitution lacks any legal basis.

The Federal Council - by its constitution that instance to implement the referendum would have - remained idle, as a State Government approved a minaret, although the state government declared a year ago, the immediate application of the minaret ban and this is based explicitly on pending applications has. The Berne building permit for a minaret in Langenthal the state government plans - to intervene rather than under constitutional mandate against the vote offense - left to the decision in federal court, although under the Federal Constitution to correct any court for a basis of a valid recognized popular initiative taken decision or reverse it can. The Federal Council is moving outside the Constitution.

end of the observation phase

Egerkingen The committee, which launched the initiative and minaret ban enforced in the voting campaign, the Federal Council has given a full year period to implement the decision of the sovereign at last. The Federal Council let the deadline idly pass. Egerkingen The Committee is not waiting any longer. Today, exactly one year after the Yes on minaret ban, it becomes active again. It presents the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" as a guide, as it is implemented by the People and the adopted minarets.

principles of the Manifesto

The Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" is based on the fact that Switzerland is a Western country on Christian foundations. Those who move here can be added to respect this - where is each resident in Switzerland Full range of religious freedom guaranteed.

The minaret has nothing to do with religion, however. It is a symbol of the socio-political Islam, which is guaranteed in the constitution opposes basic rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is against the sovereign. The prohibition expresses that the democratically established legal system in Switzerland is compulsory for all residents of the country. proceed as long as Islam instructions to the Muslim faithful, are contrary to the fundamental rights of freedom, Muslims may only become naturalized if they confess in a statement formally to the unconditional respect for the Swiss Federal Constitution and the principles set out in their rights and obligations. Muslims who refuse to integrate, The residence permit will be revoked.

oppression is not tolerated

-Muslim oppression, ie headscarf and veil coercion, violence in the form of punishment, revenge, stoning, but also calls for such violence have no place in Switzerland. Neither polygamy nor forced marriages, not marriage by proxy or in accordance with the marriage of minors to the Swiss legal system. In a free country like Switzerland, citizens express their personal, independent thought with an open face. Face veil does not belong to Switzerland.

All are equal before the law

The distinction between "pure" and "impure", resulting in claims for burial in "pure", ie Christians free soil are derived in breach of Swiss law. Anyone who demands such has to bury their dead in their home country.

The banishment of Christian religious symbols from public buildings or Christian traditions or from school (Christmas) is misplaced. Compulsory education is fully applicable to both sexes and for all the teaching lessons.

*

This, in brief, the principles of the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland". Who are the Federal Constitution, who the Fundamental rights and freedoms in our Constitution seriously understands the manifesto as a foundation for a free Switzerland free people - as it has been given to us by our ancestors.

Ulrich Schlüer

Treating Scabies With Capsaicin

Gender mainstreaming - feminist indoctrination

gender mainstreaming in elementary school
tax money for sex-indoctrination

By William Villiger, Eggenwil AG

The re-education project "Gender Mainstreaming" was launched in 1995 by the international women's movement in Beijing as a gender equality strategy.

Not only the UN has written on gender mainstreaming in its agenda, the project was 1999, incorporated into EU law (Treaty of Amsterdam). Since then tried to implement gender mainstreaming for the guiding principle for the actions of the administrations of all levels across Europe.

is in this context that the order of the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) to the College of Education of Central Switzerland (PHZ) to build up a competence center for sex education. There is already working on the curriculum models that will then be incorporated in the curriculum 21 - and thus also in the classroom. As gender mainstreaming is a comprehensive and targeted strategy is applied, which aims to sustainability, it is obvious that even the "more malleable Children targeted by the project operator will be taken. Moreover, the time from Perspective of gender mainstreaming promoters now cheap: HarmoS curriculum and 21 are seen as excellent opportunities for the Switzerland-wide introduction of a gender-compatible sex education.

goals of gender mainstreaming

gender mainstreaming as a strategy of equal opportunities policy asserts that there is any area which is not influenced by male or female behavior patterns and values. The gender role behavior is culturally constructed, that is learned and therefore changeable.

future there is the freedom of a new "gender justice" among educated people, his race and his sexual orientation free to choose to decide that is personal and arbitrary, if he or she wants to be male or female, heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual. From the perspective of Teacher Education of Central Switzerland are already four years old are defined as sexual beings, and the eleven-year schooling (HarmoS) is targeted for gender-oriented influence be used on children aged four to fifteen years.

Legal framework

does The Center for Sex Education with a totalitarian claim: The objectives of gender mainstreaming sex education be simply explained as non-negotiable, by appealing to human rights. To circumvent possible opposition from the Cantons, uses the Federal Office of Public Health of the democratically legitimated poorly Education Directors' Conference (EDK) and the curriculum 21, which will be introduced by decree, with which he is not capable of referendum. By "targeted and strategic lobbying» 1) is prescribed by the above re-education program for parents and democratic control over and are smuggled into the classroom.

characteristic is this: The gay organizations sit on the advisory board of the Competence Centre. The parents but to be denied any influence on events in the classroom: "The legal and administrative separation of HIV prevention and sex education in schools should be repealed. They should be taught as part of a mandatory unified curriculum "..

frontal attack on the family

has always been the bourgeois family, the Marxists stumbling block: How locates Friedrich Engels in the patriarchal family organized the "first class opposition," which must be overcome on the way to a classless society. The new SP-party program to find the sentence. "Who wants human society has to overcome the male" The SP is oriented toward intellectual fathers of the '68 revolution ("Frankfurt School"), which the destruction the "authoritarian family" pushed it forward with the goal of "sexual liberation". Gender mainstreaming is now radically works by the youngest is yet to be taught that the natural mapping of man and woman is only "seemingly natural".

In Switzerland, the marriage but to non-matrimonial relationship priority due to their outstanding importance for the state and society. It is therefore constitutionally protected.

The expansion of sex education (biological aspects) on the sex education (social aspects) in addition to special educators, school social, school mediators, school psychologists, another line of work is created: An army of self-styled "sex educators" will haunt the future with missionary zeal by the school buildings and the young people teach what they know either long or do not want to know. These sex educators do presume to arrogantly invade the privacy of children and families and the ethical, moral and religious value orientations of parents to undermine. They want to force children to take part in events (class hours, projects, school theaters) - dispensations are excluded - where intimate things are discussed in public.

teaching

The Center for Sexual Education sees in the center of school sex education, the "self-determination of the child":

self-determination of the timing and choice of partnerships and the form of life;
self-determination and autonomy over time and number of children and their right, on aspects of sexual and informed reproductive health to be and to use their services,
representation of the equivalence of different sexual orientations and identities.

reduced Obviously, the sexual morality of this so-called competence center on the use of rubber and pills. Lawful and good is all that the child feels himself said as pleasurable or interesting and what has been partners with any "negotiated agreement". The main motto raised self-determination of youth is clearly aimed at the parenting responsibilities.

The fact that the teacher of a country are to be taken to task for propagating a particular ideology that blends into totalitarian states. In the democratic Switzerland, this is a monstrous task. Since the introduction of compulsory schooling is its ideological neutrality. A requirement that should be in the classrooms now advocating a state-authorized, permissive sexual morality, gives the Cultural Revolution of the so-called "sexual liberation" a new dramatic dimension with unforeseeable consequences for society.

Since the Federal Constitution of the traditional family explicitly assigns a special status, has such a hierarchy must be reflected in the educational system: the young people in our schools are replacing the concepts of gender mainstreaming, rather the conditions for success, the benefits and the state-preserving power of the millennia-old way of life "family", will be presented.

We demand that the family-destructive agitation of the Federal Office of Public Health and the College of Education Central Switzerland and its focus on gender mainstreaming to be stopped. Though tax dollars should be used then to build a "Centre of Excellence for Genealogy." The colleges of education should be instructed to appoint working groups with designated family specialists, who work out principles for the education and training of incumbent teachers and teachers for the education and training of teachers at teacher training colleges.

William Villiger