passive response to Federal
manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland"
National Ulrich Schlüer, Flaach, ZH
On 29 November 2009, decided the People and the minaret ban with a clear majority. For one year from the Federal Council is expected opinion of how they will implement that referendum. Three times required advances, and events such comments. Three times more The Federal Council.
a written reply to interpellation would eliminate any obligation of the Federal Council, as he had them put in order-handling in the mass on the agenda of the special session on crime reduction. When the interpellators resist the attempt disposal, they simply disappeared from the agenda.
facts
The action brought by Geneva Muslims to the European Court of Human Rights for the purpose of the cancellation broke the Swiss referendum on minaret ban and a solicitation from the Federal Council. This doubted but on procedural grounds the jurisdiction of Strasbourg. The Federal Council but avoided any assertion that according to Swiss constitutional law, no court of a decision of the Swiss sovereign has the right to overturn. Instead, signals the Federal unconstitutional willingness to continue not only Swiss law, but also provisions of the Federal Constitution as subordinate to international law to be classified. For such a devaluation of the Federal Constitution lacks any legal basis.
The Federal Council - by its constitution that instance to implement the referendum would have - remained idle, as a State Government approved a minaret, although the state government declared a year ago, the immediate application of the minaret ban and this is based explicitly on pending applications has. The Berne building permit for a minaret in Langenthal the state government plans - to intervene rather than under constitutional mandate against the vote offense - left to the decision in federal court, although under the Federal Constitution to correct any court for a basis of a valid recognized popular initiative taken decision or reverse it can. The Federal Council is moving outside the Constitution.
end of the observation phase
Egerkingen The committee, which launched the initiative and minaret ban enforced in the voting campaign, the Federal Council has given a full year period to implement the decision of the sovereign at last. The Federal Council let the deadline idly pass. Egerkingen The Committee is not waiting any longer. Today, exactly one year after the Yes on minaret ban, it becomes active again. It presents the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" as a guide, as it is implemented by the People and the adopted minarets.
principles of the Manifesto
The Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" is based on the fact that Switzerland is a Western country on Christian foundations. Those who move here can be added to respect this - where is each resident in Switzerland Full range of religious freedom guaranteed.
The minaret has nothing to do with religion, however. It is a symbol of the socio-political Islam, which is guaranteed in the constitution opposes basic rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is against the sovereign. The prohibition expresses that the democratically established legal system in Switzerland is compulsory for all residents of the country. proceed as long as Islam instructions to the Muslim faithful, are contrary to the fundamental rights of freedom, Muslims may only become naturalized if they confess in a statement formally to the unconditional respect for the Swiss Federal Constitution and the principles set out in their rights and obligations. Muslims who refuse to integrate, The residence permit will be revoked.
oppression is not tolerated
-Muslim oppression, ie headscarf and veil coercion, violence in the form of punishment, revenge, stoning, but also calls for such violence have no place in Switzerland. Neither polygamy nor forced marriages, not marriage by proxy or in accordance with the marriage of minors to the Swiss legal system. In a free country like Switzerland, citizens express their personal, independent thought with an open face. Face veil does not belong to Switzerland.
All are equal before the law
The distinction between "pure" and "impure", resulting in claims for burial in "pure", ie Christians free soil are derived in breach of Swiss law. Anyone who demands such has to bury their dead in their home country.
The banishment of Christian religious symbols from public buildings or Christian traditions or from school (Christmas) is misplaced. Compulsory education is fully applicable to both sexes and for all the teaching lessons.
*
This, in brief, the principles of the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland". Who are the Federal Constitution, who the Fundamental rights and freedoms in our Constitution seriously understands the manifesto as a foundation for a free Switzerland free people - as it has been given to us by our ancestors.
Ulrich Schlüer
0 comments:
Post a Comment