Polaroid 600 Film Substitutefujifilm Instax

No Islamization of Switzerland!

passive response to Federal
manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland"
National Ulrich Schlüer, Flaach, ZH

On 29 November 2009, decided the People and the minaret ban with a clear majority. For one year from the Federal Council is expected opinion of how they will implement that referendum. Three times required advances, and events such comments. Three times more The Federal Council.

a written reply to interpellation would eliminate any obligation of the Federal Council, as he had them put in order-handling in the mass on the agenda of the special session on crime reduction. When the interpellators resist the attempt disposal, they simply disappeared from the agenda.

facts

The action brought by Geneva Muslims to the European Court of Human Rights for the purpose of the cancellation broke the Swiss referendum on minaret ban and a solicitation from the Federal Council. This doubted but on procedural grounds the jurisdiction of Strasbourg. The Federal Council but avoided any assertion that according to Swiss constitutional law, no court of a decision of the Swiss sovereign has the right to overturn. Instead, signals the Federal unconstitutional willingness to continue not only Swiss law, but also provisions of the Federal Constitution as subordinate to international law to be classified. For such a devaluation of the Federal Constitution lacks any legal basis.

The Federal Council - by its constitution that instance to implement the referendum would have - remained idle, as a State Government approved a minaret, although the state government declared a year ago, the immediate application of the minaret ban and this is based explicitly on pending applications has. The Berne building permit for a minaret in Langenthal the state government plans - to intervene rather than under constitutional mandate against the vote offense - left to the decision in federal court, although under the Federal Constitution to correct any court for a basis of a valid recognized popular initiative taken decision or reverse it can. The Federal Council is moving outside the Constitution.

end of the observation phase

Egerkingen The committee, which launched the initiative and minaret ban enforced in the voting campaign, the Federal Council has given a full year period to implement the decision of the sovereign at last. The Federal Council let the deadline idly pass. Egerkingen The Committee is not waiting any longer. Today, exactly one year after the Yes on minaret ban, it becomes active again. It presents the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" as a guide, as it is implemented by the People and the adopted minarets.

principles of the Manifesto

The Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" is based on the fact that Switzerland is a Western country on Christian foundations. Those who move here can be added to respect this - where is each resident in Switzerland Full range of religious freedom guaranteed.

The minaret has nothing to do with religion, however. It is a symbol of the socio-political Islam, which is guaranteed in the constitution opposes basic rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is against the sovereign. The prohibition expresses that the democratically established legal system in Switzerland is compulsory for all residents of the country. proceed as long as Islam instructions to the Muslim faithful, are contrary to the fundamental rights of freedom, Muslims may only become naturalized if they confess in a statement formally to the unconditional respect for the Swiss Federal Constitution and the principles set out in their rights and obligations. Muslims who refuse to integrate, The residence permit will be revoked.

oppression is not tolerated

-Muslim oppression, ie headscarf and veil coercion, violence in the form of punishment, revenge, stoning, but also calls for such violence have no place in Switzerland. Neither polygamy nor forced marriages, not marriage by proxy or in accordance with the marriage of minors to the Swiss legal system. In a free country like Switzerland, citizens express their personal, independent thought with an open face. Face veil does not belong to Switzerland.

All are equal before the law

The distinction between "pure" and "impure", resulting in claims for burial in "pure", ie Christians free soil are derived in breach of Swiss law. Anyone who demands such has to bury their dead in their home country.

The banishment of Christian religious symbols from public buildings or Christian traditions or from school (Christmas) is misplaced. Compulsory education is fully applicable to both sexes and for all the teaching lessons.

*

This, in brief, the principles of the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland". Who are the Federal Constitution, who the Fundamental rights and freedoms in our Constitution seriously understands the manifesto as a foundation for a free Switzerland free people - as it has been given to us by our ancestors.

Ulrich Schlüer

Treating Scabies With Capsaicin

Gender mainstreaming - feminist indoctrination

gender mainstreaming in elementary school
tax money for sex-indoctrination

By William Villiger, Eggenwil AG

The re-education project "Gender Mainstreaming" was launched in 1995 by the international women's movement in Beijing as a gender equality strategy.

Not only the UN has written on gender mainstreaming in its agenda, the project was 1999, incorporated into EU law (Treaty of Amsterdam). Since then tried to implement gender mainstreaming for the guiding principle for the actions of the administrations of all levels across Europe.

is in this context that the order of the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) to the College of Education of Central Switzerland (PHZ) to build up a competence center for sex education. There is already working on the curriculum models that will then be incorporated in the curriculum 21 - and thus also in the classroom. As gender mainstreaming is a comprehensive and targeted strategy is applied, which aims to sustainability, it is obvious that even the "more malleable Children targeted by the project operator will be taken. Moreover, the time from Perspective of gender mainstreaming promoters now cheap: HarmoS curriculum and 21 are seen as excellent opportunities for the Switzerland-wide introduction of a gender-compatible sex education.

goals of gender mainstreaming

gender mainstreaming as a strategy of equal opportunities policy asserts that there is any area which is not influenced by male or female behavior patterns and values. The gender role behavior is culturally constructed, that is learned and therefore changeable.

future there is the freedom of a new "gender justice" among educated people, his race and his sexual orientation free to choose to decide that is personal and arbitrary, if he or she wants to be male or female, heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual. From the perspective of Teacher Education of Central Switzerland are already four years old are defined as sexual beings, and the eleven-year schooling (HarmoS) is targeted for gender-oriented influence be used on children aged four to fifteen years.

Legal framework

does The Center for Sex Education with a totalitarian claim: The objectives of gender mainstreaming sex education be simply explained as non-negotiable, by appealing to human rights. To circumvent possible opposition from the Cantons, uses the Federal Office of Public Health of the democratically legitimated poorly Education Directors' Conference (EDK) and the curriculum 21, which will be introduced by decree, with which he is not capable of referendum. By "targeted and strategic lobbying» 1) is prescribed by the above re-education program for parents and democratic control over and are smuggled into the classroom.

characteristic is this: The gay organizations sit on the advisory board of the Competence Centre. The parents but to be denied any influence on events in the classroom: "The legal and administrative separation of HIV prevention and sex education in schools should be repealed. They should be taught as part of a mandatory unified curriculum "..

frontal attack on the family

has always been the bourgeois family, the Marxists stumbling block: How locates Friedrich Engels in the patriarchal family organized the "first class opposition," which must be overcome on the way to a classless society. The new SP-party program to find the sentence. "Who wants human society has to overcome the male" The SP is oriented toward intellectual fathers of the '68 revolution ("Frankfurt School"), which the destruction the "authoritarian family" pushed it forward with the goal of "sexual liberation". Gender mainstreaming is now radically works by the youngest is yet to be taught that the natural mapping of man and woman is only "seemingly natural".

In Switzerland, the marriage but to non-matrimonial relationship priority due to their outstanding importance for the state and society. It is therefore constitutionally protected.

The expansion of sex education (biological aspects) on the sex education (social aspects) in addition to special educators, school social, school mediators, school psychologists, another line of work is created: An army of self-styled "sex educators" will haunt the future with missionary zeal by the school buildings and the young people teach what they know either long or do not want to know. These sex educators do presume to arrogantly invade the privacy of children and families and the ethical, moral and religious value orientations of parents to undermine. They want to force children to take part in events (class hours, projects, school theaters) - dispensations are excluded - where intimate things are discussed in public.

teaching

The Center for Sexual Education sees in the center of school sex education, the "self-determination of the child":

self-determination of the timing and choice of partnerships and the form of life;
self-determination and autonomy over time and number of children and their right, on aspects of sexual and informed reproductive health to be and to use their services,
representation of the equivalence of different sexual orientations and identities.

reduced Obviously, the sexual morality of this so-called competence center on the use of rubber and pills. Lawful and good is all that the child feels himself said as pleasurable or interesting and what has been partners with any "negotiated agreement". The main motto raised self-determination of youth is clearly aimed at the parenting responsibilities.

The fact that the teacher of a country are to be taken to task for propagating a particular ideology that blends into totalitarian states. In the democratic Switzerland, this is a monstrous task. Since the introduction of compulsory schooling is its ideological neutrality. A requirement that should be in the classrooms now advocating a state-authorized, permissive sexual morality, gives the Cultural Revolution of the so-called "sexual liberation" a new dramatic dimension with unforeseeable consequences for society.

Since the Federal Constitution of the traditional family explicitly assigns a special status, has such a hierarchy must be reflected in the educational system: the young people in our schools are replacing the concepts of gender mainstreaming, rather the conditions for success, the benefits and the state-preserving power of the millennia-old way of life "family", will be presented.

We demand that the family-destructive agitation of the Federal Office of Public Health and the College of Education Central Switzerland and its focus on gender mainstreaming to be stopped. Though tax dollars should be used then to build a "Centre of Excellence for Genealogy." The colleges of education should be instructed to appoint working groups with designated family specialists, who work out principles for the education and training of incumbent teachers and teachers for the education and training of teachers at teacher training colleges.

William Villiger

Can Tech Deck Cause Caner

Nature Park Strategy

nature parks - a neo-liberal EU project

by Erika Voegeli

nature parks are not a Swiss product, but an EU import items. They fit seamlessly into all strategies of the neoliberal globalists to the dissolution of nation states. Privatization is a keyword in the country of resources and public scrutiny of states and municipalities should be withdrawn. Entbürgerlichung citizens would have a second read, for privatization of a part, and supranational structures on the other hand, create new private-sector influence and decision-making beyond the state-guaranteed political rights, which are to be whittled down because of ever-smaller areas of influence.
The EU itself is a prime example: Fewer laws are passed by elected parliaments of the nation-states, instead, they are not created out of 27 commissioners elected by the people - under the influence of 15 000 well-paid lobbyists of economic and financial groups who maintain their offices in Brussels for this.
will host the Nature Park Strategy, including a program of the European Union to "rural development" because the countries of the EU are behind areas covered by such projects. And just as in the nature parks in Switzerland, they are also in environmental protection, economic development, promotion of labels for better marketing of local products, tourism promotion, job creation, etc. PR-touted moderate. If

is controlled "from the bottom up" from above
is a fact that nature parks on a site of European Commission figure as examples of so-called Local Action Groups - local action groups. This form is read accurately, "the main supports for the implementation of the Leader approach." 1 This entirely non-local, but developed by the EU headquarters approach used by the action groups to implement "to their development strategy and finance. These strategies are the promotion of Public Private Sector Partnerships created and set a multisectoral, from bottom to above is the approach one, which local cooperation and local networks promotes. "2
The action groups are in turn part of national networks that incorporate everything from This development is involved. Merged all is the European Network for Rural Development (European Network for Rural Development ENRD), responsible for effective implementation of EU development programs for rural space.

appetite for use of rural resources
The EU's interest is not unfounded, after all correspond rural areas in the EU 90% of the territory ", and rural development is a vital area of policy. Agriculture and forestry remain crucial for land use and management of natural resources in rural areas of the EU ... "3
Solo the fact that the so-called local action groups have different structures (Leader, National Network, European Network) are finally coupled to the policy of the EU Commission to punish the entire representation lies. What at the municipal level as a local action group comes along, posing as a strategy from the bottom up, turns out to be the last link of a staged the Brussels strategy that presents itself as the promotion of local concern to citizens to suggest, but in reality to Brussels standards and regulatory influences which may prove to be a network of pitfalls and costly court proceedings for the local economy.

"harmonization" - Cover term for elimination of the citizens and centralization
As the dissolution of national boundaries is being driven, presents itself more specific on the page "Regional Policy European Union" under "natural park with no barriers." Because the landscape is a "geographic unit" fancy that had this "separation" by breaking down the barriers - and therefore national government structures, the "harmonized" would be - reversed werden.4 harmonization - a typical spin - means: What has been the law assumed by municipalities, districts, cantons and states, was intended as dissolved and in the example of nature parks on the decisions of such public - private - action groups and associations are assigned, which are connected through the appropriate networks or financial dependence on EU requirements.

dismantling of democracy - not Swiss way
Looking at the development of nature parks in Switzerland, it is found that the approach is virtually the same way. The - empty - Brussels drip missing though, he is replaced by funds from the federal treasury. And this is exactly analogous to the Leader-Strategy public communities involved in a private club, which then forms a new layer that is - and this is crucial for Switzerland - Cut off the direct democratic influence, it creates structures that are ultimately removed from the political control of the population. Well, in the case of nature parks to rate the voters of each affected communities of accession to the park contract - that was then but the last time the procedure is otherwise similar to that in the non-democratically elected Metropolitan conferences and unite in the urban areas of the midlands: decide where Executive members of the participating cities and municipalities have programs for this region - although this constitutionally established power of the federal and cantonal constituent political bodies is, as such, the political right - are - referendum and initiative. It creates another with such bodies, not constitutionally defined, not constitutionally recognized level that ascribes to decision-making powers, which allocated federal and cantonal constitutions clearly and are not available. This is not democratically controlled intermediate level produced or copied - in combination with other such bodies, and sometimes with individual departments to federal agencies that promote such initiatives, in the case of natural parks in the responsible Federal Office for the Environment - policies, regulations, ordinances, etc., in analogy the process in the EU.
The concept that Make private "quasi-governmental organizations" state tasks pushes back the state and initiate its gradual privatization. Here - without a formal EU membership - at different levels of structures tinkered, who, along with other places could fit into neo-liberal concepts. For instance, when the appetite for "land use and management of natural resources" to the financial possibilities of privatized infrastructure or water resources depends.

financial enticements from euphoric times
Switzerland needs at least not such concepts. And certainly not to in times of economic stress, as in the development of such structures money flow, sometimes a lot of money, such as for feasibility studies or the like. In this case, these projects were developed in a time when still plenty of money flowed into the federal treasury. Meanwhile show the shocks of the financial and economic crisis, its impact: The current federal revenues will be significantly lower. And probably the capacity for this park projects for financing more expensive design and feasibility studies already exhausted, there would be any additional costs to be borne by the municipalities and cantons.

Back to reason
nature and landscape are with us for decades maintained and protected. When it really about the promotion of rural Areas is: How would it instead, with a reminder as to the investment support fund for mountain areas? This fund was recently boosted by paying about 1.5 billion francs. This countless interest-free loans have been funded for infrastructure buildings and communities are paid back reliably. This fund has now been disbanded in the new regional policy - to finance the payments of the federal government for park projects from this? But this time without repayment. Until the fund is empty? And then? If the communities of their duty? Or we will sell off our living space to private investors?
we reflect back on ourselves, on our own Values and experiences. Solving us from the mistaken belief that anything new is inherently better. Switzerland has made with the investment support fund best experience. How about instead of destroying democratic EU projects with a revival of the genuine Swiss and truly sustainable solution?
And by the way: Uri would, for example, with its folk theater in which the school children to the Chief Magistrate the valley participated and were met with the visitors to enthusiastic applause, to offer something more autonomous and more meaningful, as an EU copied parking regulations and other additions for the Label vast salad. Besides, such initiatives also give opportunity to young people with meaningful activities let us begin to teach them history and general knowledge in addition to their importance to the community and the common good, instead of leaving it to the mindless cultural degradation of the American way of life.

a leader stands for "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économie Rurale", which means "the links between rural economy and development actions."
2 http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/rural-development -policy/leader/en/leader_home_en.cfm)
3 http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/rural-development-policy/introduction/en/introduction_home_en.cfm
4 European Commission. Regional Policy European Union. Natural parks without barriers (Pdf.)

Template Dora's Backpack

Nature Parks - expropriation rates

give "No more restrictions on our freedom," Different communities
"nature parks" a rejection
thk. The protection of and care for nature in the responsible people in Switzerland of course. One will hardly find someone who is not of this opinion, and therefore it does in our country the way it looks: a cherished environment and a high awareness that this landscape is the foundation of our lives. For the people engaged in agriculture, it is clear that one must never be their own livelihoods, destroy the land, but to its receipt of generations must be assured. No farmer is driving over-exploitation of his country, is finally to be the greatest asset.

Direct democracy does not need a "nature park"
the more absurd it is when cross to be built on Switzerland called natural parks that are already guaranteed by the protection of a nature and landscape protection highly controlled environment. With positive terms such as "protection of our environment," "Living Together", "Park communities connect," "future itself make" and the like - the whole expression is reminiscent of the jargon of the Future Workshop - to the citizen with a positive attitude towards the "nature parks" caused.
is On closer inspection, however, that this is satisfied we already all without "natural parks", particularly in the communities: the protection of our nature is all a big concern, together we make citizens have always shared, individual communities have evolved from always come together to resolve pending issues and problems together, and a free citizen in a country with direct democracy to make its future together with his fellow man himself always

we like to sell our country to tourism?
In the areas that belong to a nature reserve, live, people in villages or small towns to practice their Career there, operate a business and go to work every day. The term park is completely out of place and suggests something quite different. Since when is defined as the habitat of humans as a park or even park? The argument is
tried again and again, tourism and the distribution of any label that aim to ensure economic prosperity in the communities. Do we want our communities to really target only a tourist bubble and thus sell our country to a whatever kind tourism? It is our habitat, and first and foremost we need it to live happy. Mind you, the label assignment is for the federal government. These are the guidelines of the EU, which we submit should. Who met in a park communities can thus be taken more to the apron strings. Nothing of "Shaping the future itself." The opposite is the case, we will dictate to people how to make them more in the future, their environment and especially to not have make.

"... not to let soap of beautiful words,"
In several towns that lie within a nature reserve, perimeter, there have been recent vote. In this case, the citizens of the affected communities decide whether to join the so-called park association and thus endorse the park concept do. In
Oberhalbstein area and in the Albula in the Grisons was Some communities on the Parc Ela tuned. Two of the 21 municipalities which are to form the Parc Ela, voted against a candidate so far, additional votes are pending. If you
with individual citizens were there got to talk, to listen to different arguments. But mostly outweighed the concerns that it is not clear how big the development rights and restrictions in agricultural use are of the soil. The argument of the proponents that the accession no change and can therefore be accepted without hesitation, could not convince the communities in Riom-Parsonz and Tinizong. A resident said therefore: "Why do we need a park, if things remain, as it is? "The restriction of local autonomy, coupled with the loss of direct participation, engaged citizens. "Why should we accept a contract that is in the set do not even realize what they can and can not afterwards. We must not let the soap of beautiful words, or we have lost our freedom. "

serious concerns and observations
In the cantons of Uri and Nidwalden and Obwalden is about the constitution of the" nature park central Switzerland. " There, too, will come in the next few weeks to more votes in each municipality. Engelberg is the community from the project dropped out before the "Park Agreement" to the vote has submitted. As expressed by the municipal administration, was there was in Engelberg from the majority of stakeholders and tourist organizations' concerns and critical opposition. " In a communication from the council it is stated inter alia: ". Other concerns were primarily in the area of any future protection as well as the demarcation issue of the park perimeter in Engelberg» On demand was learned that the park contract not here is clear what impact it had on the construction law and landscape protection, which today is already very strict and had prevented the recent creation of a new ski slopes. According to the local government had the people's decision On the withdrawal from the "park project" supported, and the issue was now off the table.

"The park central Switzerland is not tangible" There
hope of a return to reason not only the example of the two communities in the area and Oberhalbstein in Engelberg, but also the vote of the municipality in the canton of Uri Gurtnellen. Although the council calls for joining the "Nature Park Central Switzerland", had voted against the majority of the community's financial contribution of 11 000 francs and prevented the membership of the park association. At the community meeting itself, it did not look like the result. There were hardly any votes against it, but it was brought to all issues. That was the end the majority, however, shows that the questions were well answered hardly satisfactory. subject to further restrictions need was not for the citizens of Gurtnellen imagine. Same reluctance also entertains the local council of Beckenried, advocating a rejection of the park project. In a statement, he notes that the council "further discussed thoroughly with the park project" was. He came to the conclusion that was "not the natural park Urschweiz tangible". "It remains unclear what additional requirements and limitations such a nature park will bring."
goes on to say, "the political community would in future be free of additional restrictions and conditions ". The Mayor clarified: "It is for every community has a different situation, one can not decide for others, the superior, each community for itself whether it wants to. But we can not advocate for our community. "The concerns expressed herein are entirely justified. IT IS, for example, after the park regulation of the League under Article 20, paragraph d: ". Existing impairment of the landscape and townscape of buildings, installations and uses [are] opportunity arises to reduce or eliminate"
Therefore it is clear how much agency a single municipality still owns.

If "park Unions" constitutionally permissible?
The community autonomy and broad political participation, the key characteristics of Swiss democracy, may not be a club regulation sacrificed at the end, the citizen does not allow more participation. After joining the church in this club is no longer the decision-making authority at the local residents, but at a parent association, through which the executive members of the community residents without representation decisions. This raises serious questions whether the state law is ever permissible. A responsible management of our country and our landscape In the interest of all, it needs to ensure no "nature parks" à la EU, but free and self-determined citizens.