What Is The Best Filling For Sofas

The Fall of the €

forced currency €: No salvation, but a horror without end

by Dr. Bruno Bandulet

When the members of the German Bundestag last May agreed to the so-called Euro-rescue without knowing the details and without the final costs, they gave themselves more to the illusion that the mere presentation of the instruments would be pointless to use them. Time has shown that the crisis of the single currency at that time was by no means settled. She had just begun.

Before we turn to the question of whether and how to survive the euro in the coming years will be necessary to establish that we are dealing with since the spring of 2010 with another € - not a replacement for the original European D-Mark reserve currency, but with a European emergency money, at best, with a reincarnation of the French franc.
In a significant estimates of the governments, the EU Commission and the European Central Bank staged coup, the three pillars on which to rest a stable euro, demolished. Thus, the Maastricht Treaty agreed business base fell. European law has been broken with impunity.

three principles on which the euro was based
The idea of a strong euro is known based on three principles. First, the fact that clear limits were met for the debt, namely 3% of gross domestic product with the annual budget deficit and 60% relative to the total accumulated national debt. (In compliance with this debt criteria of the Euro might have worked, but they were in 1999 not for its introduction as book money taken seriously.) Second, contained and the contract contains the so-called no-bailout clause that no Euro-Land for the debts of another liable. And thirdly, the European Central Bank fully independent of political influence. It was and is its forbidden to buy up government bonds and thus bring new money into circulation, ie "print". All three principles have been sacrificed to political expediency. Had the government stayed true to the contract, then the euro-zone would likely have broken up last spring.

The Legend of the 750-billion rescue
Since then, we try to keep the forced currency with the help of a big bluff on water and to gain time. The bluff is easily seen through, if we look at the design of the rescue package agreed in May in more detail: •
can up to 60 billion euros the EU to contribute themselves. The sum is part of the EU budget and is therefore supported by all 27 EU states - not only by the governments of the euro zone. Title: European Financial Stabilization Mechanism (EFSM).
• In addition, the Luxembourg financial quarter, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), headed by German Klaus Regling founded. The EFSF is a limited company with the 16 euro countries as shareholders. It is entitled to receive money on the capital market and the means then pass on (to return) any bankruptcy candidates. She has not yet done, Ireland is the first case. Otherwise believe than the public, the Treaty on EFSF is unlimited. The term ends no 2013th • Approved the
EFSF were first EUR 440 billion. Since respect the special purpose vehicle of the Lord Regling but it needs to get from the top AAA credit rating agencies, and since among the guarantors and the weak currency countries are (Actually a joke), must be guaranteed the bonds issued to 120% and also must have a cash reserve to be provided. Therefore be considerably less than the 440 billion to provide. On the current state only 255 billion! And if as Ireland or Portugal or Spain fail as a guarantor, then increases of the (still) stable countries attributable fraction. Because of this, the Bundestag, in May could not know how much he charged ultimately the taxpayer. If Italy and worse, Germany has to guarantee about 226 billion euros - almost twice as much as the government believe the members of parliament made in May.
• Also on board is also The International Monetary Fund. He had pledged up to 250 billion €. Since the United States in the IMF have a blocking minority, they have for the first time a say in affairs of the European Monetary Union - an embarrassing result, given that the Europeans wanted the euro to the dollar and thus offer the American financial hegemony Paroli. Problem: As the IMF has promised to plan down to the Union's loan half (hence the original cost estimate 500 + 250 billion) because of the EU but now are only 315 billion (60 + 255), and the IMF contribution shrinks to Euro-stabilization. Namely 157.5 billion. Thus a total of 750 billion to available but only 472.5 billion. That they may only go for two or three years, can work out any yourself. Portugal would have to cope with likely also Spain, Italy anymore.
• Regardless of EFSF EFSM and were shortly before the Greek government promised in order to avoid bankruptcy loans that flow now and about 5% interest rate must be. A further 9 billion for Athens will grant the finance ministers of the euro-zone soon. then transferred in early January. Sacrifices for Greece's sovereignty and submits to an EU economic dictatorship - a parallel to the Weimar Republic, whose empire Bank sat the representatives of the victorious powers to see the Germans on the fingers. As Greece is to repay the loans ever, no one has explained to us.

The government deficits are only part of the problem
Given the debts that were before 1999 and piled up since then in the euro zone, the 472.5 billion in an emergency but a drop in the ocean, the end of 2009, Ireland was at 104, 6 billion euros in debt, Greece with 273.4 billion, 559.6 billion with Spain, Portugal with 125.9 billion and Italy with 1760.7 billion - rising trend everywhere. Not change the pledges anything. By 28 November decided rescue package Ireland at 85 billion (Irish contribution of 17.5 billion), the Irish national debt will double rapidly. Explosives, the public debt of Spain: The maturing debts and current deficits added together, the figure for 2011 estimated funding requirements of just under 200 billion (about 18% of GDP) and for 2012 of just under 150 billion. Spain in 2011 required significantly more money than Greece, Ireland and Portugal put together! With each emergency credit continues to increase the level of debt, and its operation is more difficult not easier. Thus, the bankruptcy is more expensive, the longer it is delayed. And the above figures refer only on the national debt, not the debt of the private sector, including banks, representing countries such as Ireland or Spain, the bigger problem. The national debt is but one aspect of the gloomy picture. The euro-zone lies far not only in a sovereign debt crisis, but also in a private debt and banking crisis (in the case of Ireland and Spain) in a housing crisis, the United States exceeds that of their explosive nature still. And will always lied, deceived and beautifully spoken. Already the European bank stress test in the summer was dubious and incomplete. It was intended to calm the markets, which has for a short time then it works. Even the ailing Irish Banks have passed the stress test! As in Ireland a "bad bank" was established, the National Assets Management Agency (NAMA), the Irish banks bought from bad real estate loans claimed that they had borrowed on average 77% of the project totals. Now it turns out that there were around 100%. Investors in turn were more suspicious than the Nama. They pull their money out of months of the Irish banks, and so they drove the crisis to a head. It threatened a very old-fashioned run on the banks and thus the collapse of the financial system.

The debt reduction as a "mission impossible"
What kind of a currency that must be saved permanently! And how? Remain substantially the following ways: rigorous cost-cutting measures are already underway in Ireland and the European South. The intention is not to reduce the debt, but to let him grow more slowly than he would grow without the interventions in the social system and without tax increases. Even so, the effect is deflationary and depressed. After all, the following reasoning is correct: for example, Greece would normally depreciate by 30% in order to be competitive again. Since this is the abolition of the drachma is no longer possible, should - in order to achieve the same effect - falling prices and wages by 30%. Only thus creating a vicious circle: the cost-cutting measures allow the economy to shrink much further in order to fall in tax revenues, and the government deficit is growing instead of diminishing. In response, the government would save even more, but that they can only to a certain degree, to break up social unrest and create a revolutionary situation. Under these circumstances, a reduction of the debt a "mission impossible", the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung wrote on 22 November. Nothing to add. At best, the observation that increase in the European periphery, the anti-German resentment already. The Germans are seen as a disciplinarian, who condemned the debt countries to years of depression and misery. The fatal the euro is that it has raised social tensions which now threaten to escalate to interstate conflict. The early warning of euro opponents, he would divide the EU rather than welding together has proven to be correct.

The cost of a transfer union are out of control
The second solution, favored by the EU Commission in Brussels, consists of an accelerated expansion of the Euro-zone (or the EU) to a transfer union with a financial compensation, which between the German states is similar. Such a leveling of the European standard of living equivalent to the very logic of Europeanism, the logic of centralization and uniformity. Then the still solvent taxpayer in the core area bleed just to the periphery to retain the €. The cost could be huge. "If it should be reflected in the debt crisis of the transfers," said Holger Steltzner 30 ". There is no limit or control more» October in the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
is not quite sure whether the Federal Constitutional Court would play there - nor how far to go, the Merkel government dares. For a real transfer union implies the ruin of the German government finances, and hence the future of pensions. At some point, would rebel, the German Michel. And yet to him the taxpayers in the Netherlands, in Finland, Austria and France. Especially France, the second-largest guarantor of € parachutes tend usually not to pay the bills of others. Conclusion: In order Insolvenzverschleppung and denial of reality is currently a mix of austerity (in Ireland and Southern Europe) and practiced in hard-repayable loans.

Italy would be the absolute emergency
The third solution consists in the fact that some € members resign voluntarily, with their new currency to devalue and to slash its debt as part of a bankruptcy. Exactly the fear the financial markets, hence the sale of Greek and Irish government bonds, which mirrored the rise in interest rates unaffordable level.
is certainly true that with a withdrawal of the bankruptcy of the candidates would get € Once air. But what if wiggling Belgium and Italy? The Berlusconi government is virtually impossible to act, the urgently needed structural reforms have not addressed, and public deficits must be financed increasingly from abroad because the domestic savings is insufficient. In the 90 years before the euro was adopted, Italy was already before the bankruptcy. Italy and its debts are now certainly too large to be "saved." One can only hope that the financial markets as possible long look away and ignore the gradual worsening situation in Italy for a while.

"An insidious process," writes the NZZ
The most elegant, even if present would be an improbable escape from Germany leaving the monetary union. Then the new German mark would immediately add value, and the rest of the zone would get exactly what he needs: a devaluation and the restoration of its competitiveness. But as reluctant to act without principle, Berlin Paris, France would follow suit. The result would be the splitting of the Euro-zone in a hard-and soft-currency block and thus in a north and a south-€. The German Exports would suffer temporarily, the German domestic economy would be strengthened, the high external value of the new currency would yield a sort of social dividend. A walk would not, of course. The splitting of the euro would shock the markets and the global currency markets hard. Understandable, then, that governments fear such an option. Moreover, the question whether France would be more likely to match or North to South €. There is no panacea, it does not, only the choice between different evils.
remains Either way, the situation for the foreseeable future is extremely dangerous and unpredictable. A 'depressing experiment, "called Beat Gygi the European Monetary Union in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung "of 20 November - and the euro "untested construct." Not even with a kind of fiscal Union could correct the flaws of the monetary union. "Probably, one should remember that the countries of the former rather \u0026lt;D-Mark-Blocks> could form a useful euro area," wrote Gygi. As it stood since the weaker countries from a long ordeal, "the force will cost much." Conclusion: "The Insidious in the whole process is that it gradually is going on and that the centralization always apparent success brings."

The moment of truth is only postponed
"If the euro fails, it fails Europe," declared Angela Merkel. This is nonsense, because the EU is not the same as Europe and because the euro-zone does not even cover the EU. Especially the most solid EU states are present: the Czech Republic with a debt of 35.4% with 41.6% of GDP or Denmark or Sweden 42.6%, not to mention Norway and Switzerland, are out of zone and the EU feel very comfortable. All of these currencies will survive the € and get away with it - in addition to gold - for German investors in considering the need to reduce the risk of their portfolios.
that our analysis is far too pessimistic, can be read even from a full-page review by Professor Otmar Issing, who on 11 November in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung published. As long-time chief economist of the Deutsche Bundesbank and the ECB, Issing is unverdächig to want to speak ill of the euro. He wrote that a transfer needs can be justified either socially or economically, that will be formed against a creeping expansion of the transfer as soon as resistance "within and outside Parliament", that little hope exists, "that the community has really learned from the crisis" ; that the current discussions on the reform of the Stability Pact, "nothing good promise" and that the outbreak of a new Crisis "in the not too distant future" is programmed. The article ends with the warning: "The hour of truth is just postponed."

a black Sunday for Berlin
When, on Sunday 28 November, the finance ministers of the EU and the IMF agreed the 85-billion package for Ireland, decided the same, other measures to save the €. The financial markets reacted skeptically, although the ECB had stepped up its purchases of euro government bonds currently playing. As on 28 November was adopted, amounts to a heavy defeat of the Merkel government.
• Still on 23 November, Angela Merkel, the participation of private creditors on any debt rescheduling required. You will not "paradise" to allow for banks, which remains the risk to 100% of tax payers. Five days later it was decided in Brussels that the creditors may be involved only in 2013 and then only in extreme cases, if a country is insolvent in fact - but not in case of liquidity problems. De facto reserves the EU to define the event of insolvency, as they see fit - that is not possible. No more talk of it, that the banks have been going from 2011 to the risk. •
was buried the hope of German tax payer, that of the theoretically established in May rescue in the amount 750 billion remains. He reportedly was due to expire in June 2013. Now, a permanent crisis mechanism to be introduced, called "European stability mechanism" (ESM). The euro crisis is a permanent condition, Berlin loses control as the main financier of the process. By the way: Have all the euro finance ministers decided on 28 November, yet, the term of the loans to Athens (a total of EUR 110 billion) of three to extend to seven and a half years. Fearing that it bursts, the Euro-debt bubble is inflated more and more. What should make

investors
We must imagine the Euro-drama as a rising and falling, years of crisis, with no end in sight, but it can also suddenly turn into a collapse of the currency of the financial system and the bond markets. Specifically:
• Ireland was forced to request financial assistance, although the government was liquid and was thus no urgent need for financing. Purpose of the exercise was to prevent the spread of the confidence crisis in Portugal and Spain. This will most likely not succeed. should
• The next country Portugal in the firing line - with the risk that Spain still. The government in Lisbon is only funded until the end, after which they must return to the capital market. Portuguese and English government bonds with longer maturities (approximately two years) should be avoided. The countries still enjoy a AAA status with a stable outlook: Germany, France, Austria, Finland, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The owners of Greek government bonds have to adjust to a moratorium and rescheduling, in which they will lose a part of the capital, perhaps between 30 and 50%.
• At least on the currency front, 2011 will run very volatile. The recovery of the euro in September and October has turned out to be illusory. Now he is back under pressure. The players will wait and see the outcome of the elections in Ireland early in the new year. Yet it offers The U.S. dollar is no convincing alternative to the single currency. He is at best the lesser evil. Currently, the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Bank of expansive than that of the ECB. If it were not so, the euro would be even weaker. Much depends on whether the second round of monetary expansion (quantitative easing) in the coming year, terminated or renewed. The latter is expected if the U.S. economy does not start. Either way is 2011, the monetary policy of the U.S. central bank, ie play the extent of printing money, not just the dollar, but for the price of gold an important role.
• Rightly European bank stocks are suffering from the euro crisis. Also two Years after the height of the financial crisis, the banking system is not rehabilitated. Bank shares are a risky investment, as long as it is not clear, will be affected when and to what extent the Institute of debt consolidation in the euro zone. The monetary sector thus involves a risk for the more stable European stock markets. That the German stock market is relatively good, also thanks to the below-average weighting in the financial sector. Uncomfortable by the way the situation is the Swiss National Bank. She sits on high euro positions. If the Euro collapses facing severe losses, and the SNB can only hope that thanks to rising gold prices and a corresponding increase in the valuation of their gold reserves to compensate. Over a similar risk compensation have also those investors in the euro area, which have risen a greater treasure.

Alter Ego Hair Products

The errors of the EU accession

of dipl. ETH Max Salm

first Say
assertion: In the bilateral approach would need to Switzerland as a non member of EU rules on companies in which we could not join in the development phase.
This statement may well be legally correct, in spirit it is totally wrong. For Make non-EU member Switzerland has not a single EU law, it is not acceptable. Our negotiators and the Swiss people in the event of a vote, it is completely optional a bilateral contract agreement or disagreement. This right we have but no longer, if we were an EU member. As an EU member, we only have a say in theory. Because, first, Switzerland has only one of 27 voices and secondly, the decisions not taken in the EU Parliament, but in the Commission, where the Swiss influence is minimal. Switzerland is the non-member is clearly a stronger position.

second EURO instead of francs
Claim: With the euro, we would not have the problems with the high Swiss franc.
Here one must ask: Is the high Swiss franc really a problem for Switzerland? Since we are in our country have absolutely no raw materials and also about 40 percent of our need to import food, the raw materials are cheaper by a high Swiss franc. This will help our export industry. In addition, a significant proportion of our exports to non-European countries is used, so that not all the EURO rate-misery affect our exports. As the development of the economy since the crisis since 2009 and the EURO price collapse shows our industry was able quickly to find new customers outside the EU. In the short term caused by the high Swiss franc well problems in the export industry, but innovative companies in the future could and can always find long term solutions.
addition, the EURO, and since all experts agree is a bad design. It is not possible a conglomerate of countries with such different economies such as Greece or Denmark, or Holland, and Poland to tie with a common currency. With state of their own currencies, the money flow between the different economic structures are controlled quickly and effectively.

third Foreign trade
Claim: The EU is our main trading partners, so we have to be there.
actually went Until recently, almost 60 percent of our exports to EU countries. Such a bias is always harmful, because it makes us vulnerable to blackmail. Already as a result of the recent crisis of 2009, our economy has successfully sought new markets and found one. This is the better solution as a candidate.
addition, Switzerland has been since its industrialization associated with the whole world. Even today, our authorities can negotiate to operate the export trade with all countries of the world trade agreements. As a member of the EU, we should limit ourselves to the EU's trading partners. It is very unlikely that the EU should build only because of trade relations with any country Switzerland.

4th Security
assertion: Switzerland is too small to successfully care for their safety.
Every day we receive via the media of proof that small people with their militias, with minimal armor, can beat the best professional armies in the world. The Afghans have to do the most powerful army in the world (Soviet Union) and thrown out of the country right now the Taliban are about the same with the most modern army in the world (NATO). In addition to foreign partners
is unreliable. Although England and France in 1939 because of the associated with them the Nazi Poland declared war, but the Polish independence could not save them. And in the peace talks in Yalta, the Allies Poland have passed without a fight Stalin. And today, 65 years after the war, including large parts of Poland still with Russia.
Srebrenica was protected by UN troops, but they could not prevent thousands of innocent people were murdered. Only those who can protect himself, has a chance to survive. A militia army, whose members know every stone in their own country, has finally won forever. And that's no different today. What we need is a militia army, prepared for the defense of our own country, and not an army that can lead all over the world, combined with other armies of war. And it takes the will and the determination of all. Unfortunately, shows many of our elites that determination no longer exist. And therein lies the problem.

5th Democracy, neutrality
statement: Our democracy and neutrality can persist despite accession.
There is in the EU legislation some open spaces that can exploit the Member States. But this freedom every day less. A referendum or an initiative is not in the EU. The European Commission, our neutrality, when will they ever do away without telling us. Thanks to its neutrality, Switzerland was able to stay out since the Congress of Vienna from all wars and humanitarian work on both sides of a conflict.

6th Size
assertion: Switzerland is too small to compete as an independent state.
The penchant for size is the hallmark of the modern manager. But almost all have suffered with their megalomania shipwreck.
few years ago, said the Feldschlösschen boss his company was too small to survive. He sold the brewery to the big Danish company Carlsberg. But today Feldschlösschen is in big trouble, meanwhile, flourished about 250 small and micro local Swiss breweries. The history teaches us that size does not protect from destruction. Thus, the great Ottoman Empire or the Roman empire that stretched from Africa to the Scottish border, perished miserably. Why is that? Such a large structure, and since the EU is one of them today are only in the form of a dictatorship to govern. And in all dictatorships, the top boss so far removed from reality that he is constantly wrong decision or no notice what happens in the lower ranks. The most recent example of this is the world crisis of 2009. The Little Switzerland has weathered the crisis better than all the large and powerful states.
A small structure is compact and can be much faster and more targeted response to external disturbances than the large ones. And that's true even if our direct democracy sometimes slows the policy significantly.

7th Switzerland as a special case
assertion: Switzerland is not a special case, they must open up and adapt.
Welch nonsensical statement. Because once the political characteristics are:
a) Switzerland is the only country that has a functioning direct democracy, can show the people's rights of initiative and referendum. Therefore, Switzerland is the country with a minimum of strikes and civil unrest.
b) Just as unique is the federal structure of the state. Which is due to the peaceful coexistence of four cultures and four linguistic regions. In all other countries of the world there are insurmountable problems of minorities.
c) The unambiguous and clear separation of powers, legislative, executive and judicial powers, is the Switzerland of an estimated worldwide legal certainty.
d) The Federal Constitution is still valid today, Switzerland is committed to neutrality and is ready, this neutrality with a large militia army which is strongly rooted in the people, to give Nachachtung. The Constitution requires that every healthy citizen makes military service and must always be ready to be called up for military service, that every man has his gun at his house. Unfortunately, many of our politicians are out to undermine these constitutional provisions. There are many economic and geographical characteristics that make it clear that Switzerland is a special case.
e) More than a third of the country rock and ice, and neither to live nor suitable for agriculture. This must take into account the figures for the population density and the pricing of agricultural products.
f) Switzerland has the only country Europe in general no mineral wealth. The people have to earn all prosperity with their own work.
g) The Swiss work, the only one in Europe, more than forty hours per week. This is one of the important reasons for the higher wage levels and prosperity in Switzerland.
The desire for opening to the outside world runs an open door. Since the industrialization of Switzerland, international trade relations and maintained for about 150 years ago called our hotel owners welcome guests from all over the world.
Whenever a EU rules must be adopted, the EU Turbos call for accompanying measures. Switzerland would be no special case, this would not be necessary.

8th Cherry picking
Claim: The Swiss always want special treatment. National
says Luzi Stamm: "I firmly believe that we are not \u0026lt;Rosinen picken>, but that we instead constantly \u0026lt;Kröten schlucken> am. L> The seven contracts \u0026lt;Bilaterale only the dossier \u0026lt;Specifications Handelshemmnisse> and possibly \u0026lt;Submissionswesen> for Switzerland is positive. The other five files are negative for us, including \u0026lt;Personenfreizügigkeit>. Also from the nine bilateral agreements II, most dossiers to our disadvantage: Schengen, taxation of savings through to the ridiculous Dossier \u0026lt;EU-Pensionierte>. If you want to talk about 'benefits' that we bring to the EU, of course, particularly noticed the billions for the NEAT significant that we build of course, not for domestic traffic, but can the EU through traffic. "
Switzerland is well the best contribution to a Europe afford the future if it remains what it is: a model of a small state that has the power to unite different cultures and languages, thanks to the federal base structure and a democracy that is based on actual participation. •

Source: Supplement to mediawatch.ch (www.mediawatch.ch), No. 175, December 2010. Mediawatch.ch the information of the Swiss Association "Media-panopticon."

Golean Cereals In Australia

advocates the destruction of Christianity

It is a carefully planned and designed by brainwashing, and a simultaneous de-Christianization Islamization of Europe is underway. The production is Talmudic / Pharisaic by the New World Order, a stated purpose is to hoard wealth and power for a small elite bankers at our expense. For 2000 years, powerful forces are trying to drain the teachings of Christ and in practical religion to convert them into a political instrument within specified policy framework to transform and distort - having incorrect description. Many ministers are so confused that they simply nothing more of Christ's teachings are but victims of centuries-old highly organized anti-Christian influences.

This anti-Christian influences are rooted in Gnosticism, derived from the Pharisees in Alexandria. They targeted the mixing of the doctrine of Christ, first with a Greek humanist philosophy, then by Islam (Knights Templar) - where they wanted to make man his own savior without supernatural intervention. Today, the world's religions are mixed by the Talmudic / Pharisaic New World Order in an inedible, humanistic Goulash, by the Talmudic / Pharisaic new world order that all and has forced everyone to obey by bribery / threats, serving to pacify gullible citizens of the world dictatorship under the NWO.
The chief priests seem to the UN, member of the NGO Lucis Trust, which originally was called Lucifer's Trust (Alice Bailey) to find. For his missionary purpose of the Trust "The Great Invocation" composed, used, inter alia, when the World Council of Churches, in cooperation with the UN's annual International Day of Prayer for World Peace at their "one all-embracing God" for the World Peace held. This has now been replaced by Christ, "the coming". It is of Lucis Trust said that call a World Teacher, the Christ some, others the Maitreya, some of the Mahdi, the Messiah and the Jews come back, sometimes. But he is said to be the same teacher - and he's only a teacher - not the savior. For man can save himself and an ascended master is!

Warm Masterbation Oils

attack on democracy

From Federal Ueli Maurer

Voltaire once said: "I may condemn what you say but I will defend my life that you can not say it." This is the lupenreinste democratic spirit in a nutshell.

One must own strongly considered, one must question and criticize other opinions, but we must prohibit anyone's mouth. For every white Democrat, a democracy can function only when two conditions are met:

First, the citizens have the opportunity to form an opinion. Second, referenda are unconditionally accepted and implemented.

independent thought

That's the basics of democracy. In Switzerland, each was supposed to be familiar. I deliberately say "should". Because I'm concerned about our democratic values.

There are forces in our country who are opposed to free competition - they want the free competition of products and services . Abolish The aim for our prosperity. But there also seems to forces that want to eliminate even the free competition of ideas and opinions. And that takes direct aim at our democracy. For

can form an opinion only, who has the opportunity to hear different opinions.

Democracy is the marketplace of ideas. This goes back to ancient times. On the market place, goods were traded and exchanged views. This developed into the political debate and self-determination of citizenship.

Everyone can make offers on the market for ideas: opinions, ideas, solutions. And anyone can check the deals on to question the advantages and disadvantages. Anyone may consider and decide for what convinced him most. And the idea, which then finds the greatest support, the idea is acceptable to a majority of which is made by then.

In our country there is a tradition that people openly discuss and form a clear opinion. That was already the old rural communes. And that was guaranteed in the first Constitution of 1848: freedom of press, freedom of association and right to petition to protect the open debate.

Since then it has the force of law: freedom of expression. Freedom of assembly. This is also in the current Constitution. Only the reality is unfortunately different.

No single case

riot designers fight the free speech and open political debate with threats and violence. We seem to have authorities that are struggling to enforce the constitutional order - on to our rally, 2007, during the attack on our General Secretariat in Bern 28th November.2010 and during the ban attacks on our delegates' meeting in Lausanne.

The action against the SVP is not unique. The self-proclaimed "tolerant" are intolerant quickly when someone has a different understanding of tolerance. Dissenters are to be addressed immediately targeted.

The program "Arena", for example, gets a new leader because the former sympathies have been accused for the SVP. The proximity to the SVP of course, is invented, but apparently there is already a violation of political correctness when one of the interests of an exciting and controversial discussion from time to time considered the strongest party voters.

we look to Geneva: A newspaper is a journalist now and not in the big sing along chorus. The media blow immediately to the attack. In the name of openness and tolerance, he will be tried as a heretic.

This trend worries me: If critics will not be met with arguments, but with threats of violence, bullying, then that free competition no longer plays of ideas. And that is nothing more than an attack on democracy.

referendums implement

The second prerequisite for a functioning democracy, the implementation of the plebiscites would need in our country with its long and successful tradition of democracy, be a matter of course.

The reality, unfortunately there too different. It is worrying, as referenda are derogatory comments, if they turn out not as do the certain circles.

those who dismiss the real problems of the citizens as diffuse fears, among them is that they are irrational or paranoid, and thus incapable of a reasonable decision. This is simply arrogant. And quickly then the step is made, the very principle to doubt the majority of the people.

Because even writes the "NZZ", which sees itself as the tide of liberalism, the people were themselves to blame, if now getting to the decision to expel initiative of the discussion about limiting the right of initiative, new food - in other words, this means that you People, You can go vote, as long as you take a vote as we wish. If you decide otherwise, we will remove your no democratic rights.

living democracy

I wish the democratic understanding would be in that part of society, who sees himself as the elite this country understands better anchored.

I appeal to the democratic conscience of all those who - is hardly counted - search for all kinds of reasons to ignore the popular will: Beware, set the cohesion of our society at risk! Watch out, you undermine the very basis of our freedom and our prosperity!

And I also see the responsibility of the SVP for Switzerland: Our country needs a political force that ensures diversity in the debate and defended the rights of the people. Our country needs a political force that makes for a vibrant democracy!

Ueli Maurer

speech to the party the SVP on 4 December 2010 to an open field in Gland (VD)

Basketball Cupcake Pull Apart Cake

As in Europe, the civil rights abolished

WikiLeaks: Free travel for arbitrariness - How are placed in the case of Julian Assange civil rights suspended

Udo Ulfkotte

If you have read the following lines, then you can convince themselves that Julian is currently not in Europe Assange treated differently from human rights in China or Burma. But unlike in the case of imprisoned civil rights in distant countries, we look at all Assange how the rule of law in Europe is a farce. The persecution and disenfranchisement of the Australian WikiLeaks-founder in Europe is above all a test case of how serious European politicians are still with civil rights. Assange was indeed arrested at the request of the Swedish prosecutor with the valid since 2002, the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) in Great Britain. But this EAW is now one of the most dangerous tools in order to silence unpopular people in Europe or have even disappeared in cells - even if the persons concerned have never committed a crime.

All over Europe people are being prosecuted - just because they support WikiLeaks founder Assange. For those who come to the attention of the police, it is not just the one the websites of Amazon, Mastercard and other companies have made the Internet with DOS attacks temporarily inaccessible. It extends to information available to us from security sources in Brussels now, having set up a Google Alert for Julian Assange or WikiLeaks to get the attention of the European security authorities and should be considered as potentially "suspicious." To avoid misunderstanding: No one claims that there will be against the background of Google Alerts an arrest or search warrant. But those who have set up such an alert will certainly not suspect that their interest is just saved automatically to the security authorities and is known (regardless of Google's participation). This development is part of the degradation of civil rights in Europe, which is simply not perceived by many.

On closer inspection this is all more than questionable, as familiar to citizens of European law can be undermined quickly legal. This proves the "Julian Assange case." Assange was arrested in Britain for a "crime" that in Britain - unlike in Sweden - not a crime: sex without a condom. The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) will open in Europe since 2002, the arbitrariness of the door. There is no legal review of the EAW in the alleged criminal acts. Worse: An EU citizen can arrest and be extradited to another EU country, even if the alleged offense, where he was arrested, is no crime. The EAW leads to absurd situations: As EU citizens can be arrested because they have such as the Internet critical of immigrants who commit often in the EU than EU citizens certain ethnic crimes. Who for instance, in Austria or Germany on the Internet on crime by immigrants is expressed, which can be for example in Sweden wanted for arrest because of "racism" - and suddenly the police arrive at the door and delivers the person without a judicial examination of the case in Sweden .

Imagine, it rings at your door and arresting police officers with an EAW because it was ten years in another EU country once their accounts are overdrawn. A joke? No, not at all. Jacek Jaskolski is a 58-year-old high school teacher of Polish descent who has been teaching since 2004 at a British university. In 2008 he was arrested in London because he was a decade previously coated with a stay in his old Polish home had an account. In Poland this is a criminal offense and is prosecuted in the UK are interested in possibly civil courts for that. Although Jacek Jaskolski had balanced the account has long been covered again, he was by EAW arrested and transferred to Poland. More than a thousand Poles are arrested per year in other EU countries with an EAW and delivered to their home country because they then eventually have their account overdrawn. Each year, Poland will accept in other EU countries to arrest about 5,000 citizens for "crimes". Most of these cases were prosecuted in any other EU country. According to British newspapers, the cases in which an EAW is issued in Europe more bizarre: A 16-year-old teenager was searched by EAW warrant because he had paid in a restaurant but the meal, but not the subsequently filed dessert. The EAW was then detail all the substances and their Value listed, which were contained in the pudding. The boy was flown in specially for the transfer of offenders chartered plane from London to his home in the process - British police were stunned not only about the money.

is more often used, however, the EWA is to make silence politically unpopular people for a longer period. Julian Assange is not unique. Many media do not seem the slightest knowledge of the EAW to have to win by a further instrument of arbitrary additional field: the European determining arrangement in criminal matters (EEW). This example also includes an EU-wide search and seizure decision. Each EU country can use the police in another EU country to order in another EU country - to have carried out a house search or seizure - without any judicial checks. This regulation (European Evidence Warrant - EEW) is his January 2009 entered into force and has introduced until January 2011 in all EU countries. Each local police department, a judge in an EU country, every attorney and every law enforcement agency may issue such a European search and seizure decision (2008/978/JHA EU decision of 18 December 2008) in another EU country. As with the European arrest warrant check the relevant EU country no longer the legality of the decision, but simply out of this. It is a sure-fire system to destroy unwanted people quickly - because they can fight back, however until the measures have been completed and they may have been transferred to another EU country. In the case of Julian Assange we have seen, can have far-reaching consequences of what these measures.

The Swedes, meanwhile, has caught on once to prepare for the delivery of the Australian citizen Julian Assange to the U.S.. This is only the consent of the British. In Sweden against WikiLeaks founder investigating prosecutor, Marianne Ny, announced in a press release, the British would have to agree before Assange can now be delivered quickly to the U.S.. So it's certainly not right and certainly not about an alleged rape - it's just a matter of making a people ready. But that is the farce of a law. Europe has given up. If you are interested in further background of this development, then you look around the rest to our information service.

They are then quickly find what you withhold the "quality media" of information. Those who, like Hans Leyendecker (the man was once renowned as an investigative journalist for the Süddeutsche Zeitung) these days clearly against WikiLeaks position and its founder Assange are currently clearly eaten up by envy because they do not get, but other information, views, and may publish. Leyendecker people like to talk much, "of" conspiracy theory to discredit what they themselves do not get either of information or understanding to interpret. People like Leyendecker would do well to retire to withdraw. Or they are at last and defend political prisoners as Assange. Otherwise "quality journalists share" as Leyendecker once again a clear sign of why they are in today's increasingly redundant and one of the "quality media" should be located where they belong: in the paper.

Animated Wallpaper Vlc

priority order in the gender equality offices

on feminism and women's true stories

By Barbara Steinemann, State Councillor SVP, Watt ZH

Periodically publish the Gender Equality Bureau of the Federation, the cantons and the cities of its information brochures. The one devoted to three-quarters of its pages to the school leavers, where teaching is made more palatable in a typically male-dominated profession.

"Break the traditional gender structures on! Learn a man's job! "These calls are accompanied by a portrait painter and a lot of arguments with All kinds of colorful emancipation. Frankly: The thought of a fringe group of the same sex are to me as a reader almost embarrassing, our society it is probably a little too well.

girls and women appear there as the "stupid sex," which state agencies must have for every situation his way. If we women about being left behind? Do we need a tutor? Or do the same work-site channels simply do not know what to do with their time and their ample public funds?

Islamic oppression

In our neighbor-dominated culture, the exact opposite. The oppression of women achieved in Arabia and Africa new dimensions. The recent reports by the UN to speak of emerging "gender apartheid". The South Africa of today with veil. The new victims are placed in dark clothes and stigmatized beyond recognition. Barbaric punishments and rituals, from stoning circumcisions accumulate again in the Islamic world. Girls are not worth anything, it counts more than their retail value as a bride. Women awaiting execution by stoning for adultery. The case of convicted Khayrieh in Iran has attracted international interest when her pleas were announced publicly: "I am ready to be hanged, but they should not stone me!"

Today waits Sakineh Ashtiani for months in the same country for their stoning, allegedly had contact with the widow of two men. For this she was sentenced only to 99 lashes, which punishment has been enforced.

"right" or even "justice" in these worlds are no individual claims of the individual against society and the authorities. Meanwhile, we should always be aware. So the woman will be killed, simply because they can defend themselves as a woman at the worst, however. The mystery of this injustice should draw us into its spell, not the agenda of our gender equality offices.

The West, however, is silent. In Saudi Arabia, women are hardly treated better than Camels. They may not have a passport or driving a car, they are education, occupation, deprived of even public spaces - just like the blacks in South Africa.

defend anyone but themselves? Greenpeace thinks about the whales, the Green Party to climate change, the feminists of the female apprentices in male professions. To protest against, may be as idle as the world history of the omissions. Nevertheless, if the dozen dictatorships withdraw the women's human rights is demonstrated by the systematic Looking away from indifference, fear and indifference.

And us?

want to Western Europe, immigrant Muslim women here all too often under the Yoke of their men. All too often - in fact locked in her own apartment - they are at the mercy of hard violence, many have become victims of forced marriages, the starting point for a non-free life predicament.

Where is the outcry of women's rights organizations? Find it breathtaking to equal opportunity office, the language? One in the Middle Ages left standing "culture" makes in this country wide, gender defamation already impressed the external appearance - in the form of more or less of the concealment of the body. The Equal Opportunity Office look away. Admittedly, it's also easier to brand Swiss men as bearded tyrant to correctly state.

Muslim-specific issues can be explained away so little: Other in Switzerland could ask the questions we raised last year by the initiative. You have not done it until now. Before you say loose flaky and chumming, Islam is a part of Germany, one should look at the disgusting facts that take place in Muslim areas in the eye and raise this open. Violence damages the image of Islam. And as long as the Muslims who live here do not distance themselves from such atrocities of Islam, they did not arrive in our democracy.

priority order

An ethnic discrimination all around us far from it. We do not draw the line between Muslims and all others, but we draw the line between those who live by the rules of the liberal constitutional state and those which adhere to the archaic doctrine of a backward tradition. We have always done and do it in the future. The population of Switzerland has also seen this so, otherwise they would not have voted Yes a year ago.

While breaking the women's representatives and equal opportunity offices in Switzerland, the head every day about how the women have something similar could be made and in which administrative body or to set up a women's representative expert body would be immigrants from areas greater distance and suppresses even greater cultural distance in the middle of Europe systematically.

particular, feminists and those political groups which take the matter of women, human rights, violence against the weak and ignore social issues, precisely the phenomena of Islam, which they usually fight with verve. That just to support the advance of Islam in Europe mocks any reason. The refusal of Western freedoms for Muslim women met a key condition for the winning ground human rights obligations, parallel societies. Misogyny occurs in migrants to apply the multi-cultural tolerance bid, say critics ban. Although these are to foreigners!

The most terrible human rights abuses on our planet are the local women's offices not worth a single line. The website of the Equal Opportunity Office of the City of Zurich instead lets us know that this year the prize of twenty thousand francs Diversity Award to the association "Women City Tour Zurich" will be directed. The city of Bern wants to reduce gender-based discrimination with a new action plan "a city without advertising sexist motives" prevail. This is expressed, according to what priority order, the same place gutters treat women fates ...

The migrant backgrounds are Official bodies such taboo, because reality does not fit into the ideological concept of multiculturalism. In order to accept the gender equality offices, not only thought control, they tolerate severe pain that is done to other women.

Barbara Steinemann

Polaroid 600 Film Substitutefujifilm Instax

No Islamization of Switzerland!

passive response to Federal
manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland"
National Ulrich Schlüer, Flaach, ZH

On 29 November 2009, decided the People and the minaret ban with a clear majority. For one year from the Federal Council is expected opinion of how they will implement that referendum. Three times required advances, and events such comments. Three times more The Federal Council.

a written reply to interpellation would eliminate any obligation of the Federal Council, as he had them put in order-handling in the mass on the agenda of the special session on crime reduction. When the interpellators resist the attempt disposal, they simply disappeared from the agenda.

facts

The action brought by Geneva Muslims to the European Court of Human Rights for the purpose of the cancellation broke the Swiss referendum on minaret ban and a solicitation from the Federal Council. This doubted but on procedural grounds the jurisdiction of Strasbourg. The Federal Council but avoided any assertion that according to Swiss constitutional law, no court of a decision of the Swiss sovereign has the right to overturn. Instead, signals the Federal unconstitutional willingness to continue not only Swiss law, but also provisions of the Federal Constitution as subordinate to international law to be classified. For such a devaluation of the Federal Constitution lacks any legal basis.

The Federal Council - by its constitution that instance to implement the referendum would have - remained idle, as a State Government approved a minaret, although the state government declared a year ago, the immediate application of the minaret ban and this is based explicitly on pending applications has. The Berne building permit for a minaret in Langenthal the state government plans - to intervene rather than under constitutional mandate against the vote offense - left to the decision in federal court, although under the Federal Constitution to correct any court for a basis of a valid recognized popular initiative taken decision or reverse it can. The Federal Council is moving outside the Constitution.

end of the observation phase

Egerkingen The committee, which launched the initiative and minaret ban enforced in the voting campaign, the Federal Council has given a full year period to implement the decision of the sovereign at last. The Federal Council let the deadline idly pass. Egerkingen The Committee is not waiting any longer. Today, exactly one year after the Yes on minaret ban, it becomes active again. It presents the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" as a guide, as it is implemented by the People and the adopted minarets.

principles of the Manifesto

The Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" is based on the fact that Switzerland is a Western country on Christian foundations. Those who move here can be added to respect this - where is each resident in Switzerland Full range of religious freedom guaranteed.

The minaret has nothing to do with religion, however. It is a symbol of the socio-political Islam, which is guaranteed in the constitution opposes basic rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is against the sovereign. The prohibition expresses that the democratically established legal system in Switzerland is compulsory for all residents of the country. proceed as long as Islam instructions to the Muslim faithful, are contrary to the fundamental rights of freedom, Muslims may only become naturalized if they confess in a statement formally to the unconditional respect for the Swiss Federal Constitution and the principles set out in their rights and obligations. Muslims who refuse to integrate, The residence permit will be revoked.

oppression is not tolerated

-Muslim oppression, ie headscarf and veil coercion, violence in the form of punishment, revenge, stoning, but also calls for such violence have no place in Switzerland. Neither polygamy nor forced marriages, not marriage by proxy or in accordance with the marriage of minors to the Swiss legal system. In a free country like Switzerland, citizens express their personal, independent thought with an open face. Face veil does not belong to Switzerland.

All are equal before the law

The distinction between "pure" and "impure", resulting in claims for burial in "pure", ie Christians free soil are derived in breach of Swiss law. Anyone who demands such has to bury their dead in their home country.

The banishment of Christian religious symbols from public buildings or Christian traditions or from school (Christmas) is misplaced. Compulsory education is fully applicable to both sexes and for all the teaching lessons.

*

This, in brief, the principles of the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland". Who are the Federal Constitution, who the Fundamental rights and freedoms in our Constitution seriously understands the manifesto as a foundation for a free Switzerland free people - as it has been given to us by our ancestors.

Ulrich Schlüer

Treating Scabies With Capsaicin

Gender mainstreaming - feminist indoctrination

gender mainstreaming in elementary school
tax money for sex-indoctrination

By William Villiger, Eggenwil AG

The re-education project "Gender Mainstreaming" was launched in 1995 by the international women's movement in Beijing as a gender equality strategy.

Not only the UN has written on gender mainstreaming in its agenda, the project was 1999, incorporated into EU law (Treaty of Amsterdam). Since then tried to implement gender mainstreaming for the guiding principle for the actions of the administrations of all levels across Europe.

is in this context that the order of the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) to the College of Education of Central Switzerland (PHZ) to build up a competence center for sex education. There is already working on the curriculum models that will then be incorporated in the curriculum 21 - and thus also in the classroom. As gender mainstreaming is a comprehensive and targeted strategy is applied, which aims to sustainability, it is obvious that even the "more malleable Children targeted by the project operator will be taken. Moreover, the time from Perspective of gender mainstreaming promoters now cheap: HarmoS curriculum and 21 are seen as excellent opportunities for the Switzerland-wide introduction of a gender-compatible sex education.

goals of gender mainstreaming

gender mainstreaming as a strategy of equal opportunities policy asserts that there is any area which is not influenced by male or female behavior patterns and values. The gender role behavior is culturally constructed, that is learned and therefore changeable.

future there is the freedom of a new "gender justice" among educated people, his race and his sexual orientation free to choose to decide that is personal and arbitrary, if he or she wants to be male or female, heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual. From the perspective of Teacher Education of Central Switzerland are already four years old are defined as sexual beings, and the eleven-year schooling (HarmoS) is targeted for gender-oriented influence be used on children aged four to fifteen years.

Legal framework

does The Center for Sex Education with a totalitarian claim: The objectives of gender mainstreaming sex education be simply explained as non-negotiable, by appealing to human rights. To circumvent possible opposition from the Cantons, uses the Federal Office of Public Health of the democratically legitimated poorly Education Directors' Conference (EDK) and the curriculum 21, which will be introduced by decree, with which he is not capable of referendum. By "targeted and strategic lobbying» 1) is prescribed by the above re-education program for parents and democratic control over and are smuggled into the classroom.

characteristic is this: The gay organizations sit on the advisory board of the Competence Centre. The parents but to be denied any influence on events in the classroom: "The legal and administrative separation of HIV prevention and sex education in schools should be repealed. They should be taught as part of a mandatory unified curriculum "..

frontal attack on the family

has always been the bourgeois family, the Marxists stumbling block: How locates Friedrich Engels in the patriarchal family organized the "first class opposition," which must be overcome on the way to a classless society. The new SP-party program to find the sentence. "Who wants human society has to overcome the male" The SP is oriented toward intellectual fathers of the '68 revolution ("Frankfurt School"), which the destruction the "authoritarian family" pushed it forward with the goal of "sexual liberation". Gender mainstreaming is now radically works by the youngest is yet to be taught that the natural mapping of man and woman is only "seemingly natural".

In Switzerland, the marriage but to non-matrimonial relationship priority due to their outstanding importance for the state and society. It is therefore constitutionally protected.

The expansion of sex education (biological aspects) on the sex education (social aspects) in addition to special educators, school social, school mediators, school psychologists, another line of work is created: An army of self-styled "sex educators" will haunt the future with missionary zeal by the school buildings and the young people teach what they know either long or do not want to know. These sex educators do presume to arrogantly invade the privacy of children and families and the ethical, moral and religious value orientations of parents to undermine. They want to force children to take part in events (class hours, projects, school theaters) - dispensations are excluded - where intimate things are discussed in public.

teaching

The Center for Sexual Education sees in the center of school sex education, the "self-determination of the child":

self-determination of the timing and choice of partnerships and the form of life;
self-determination and autonomy over time and number of children and their right, on aspects of sexual and informed reproductive health to be and to use their services,
representation of the equivalence of different sexual orientations and identities.

reduced Obviously, the sexual morality of this so-called competence center on the use of rubber and pills. Lawful and good is all that the child feels himself said as pleasurable or interesting and what has been partners with any "negotiated agreement". The main motto raised self-determination of youth is clearly aimed at the parenting responsibilities.

The fact that the teacher of a country are to be taken to task for propagating a particular ideology that blends into totalitarian states. In the democratic Switzerland, this is a monstrous task. Since the introduction of compulsory schooling is its ideological neutrality. A requirement that should be in the classrooms now advocating a state-authorized, permissive sexual morality, gives the Cultural Revolution of the so-called "sexual liberation" a new dramatic dimension with unforeseeable consequences for society.

Since the Federal Constitution of the traditional family explicitly assigns a special status, has such a hierarchy must be reflected in the educational system: the young people in our schools are replacing the concepts of gender mainstreaming, rather the conditions for success, the benefits and the state-preserving power of the millennia-old way of life "family", will be presented.

We demand that the family-destructive agitation of the Federal Office of Public Health and the College of Education Central Switzerland and its focus on gender mainstreaming to be stopped. Though tax dollars should be used then to build a "Centre of Excellence for Genealogy." The colleges of education should be instructed to appoint working groups with designated family specialists, who work out principles for the education and training of incumbent teachers and teachers for the education and training of teachers at teacher training colleges.

William Villiger