What Is The Best Filling For Sofas

The Fall of the €

forced currency €: No salvation, but a horror without end

by Dr. Bruno Bandulet

When the members of the German Bundestag last May agreed to the so-called Euro-rescue without knowing the details and without the final costs, they gave themselves more to the illusion that the mere presentation of the instruments would be pointless to use them. Time has shown that the crisis of the single currency at that time was by no means settled. She had just begun.

Before we turn to the question of whether and how to survive the euro in the coming years will be necessary to establish that we are dealing with since the spring of 2010 with another € - not a replacement for the original European D-Mark reserve currency, but with a European emergency money, at best, with a reincarnation of the French franc.
In a significant estimates of the governments, the EU Commission and the European Central Bank staged coup, the three pillars on which to rest a stable euro, demolished. Thus, the Maastricht Treaty agreed business base fell. European law has been broken with impunity.

three principles on which the euro was based
The idea of a strong euro is known based on three principles. First, the fact that clear limits were met for the debt, namely 3% of gross domestic product with the annual budget deficit and 60% relative to the total accumulated national debt. (In compliance with this debt criteria of the Euro might have worked, but they were in 1999 not for its introduction as book money taken seriously.) Second, contained and the contract contains the so-called no-bailout clause that no Euro-Land for the debts of another liable. And thirdly, the European Central Bank fully independent of political influence. It was and is its forbidden to buy up government bonds and thus bring new money into circulation, ie "print". All three principles have been sacrificed to political expediency. Had the government stayed true to the contract, then the euro-zone would likely have broken up last spring.

The Legend of the 750-billion rescue
Since then, we try to keep the forced currency with the help of a big bluff on water and to gain time. The bluff is easily seen through, if we look at the design of the rescue package agreed in May in more detail: •
can up to 60 billion euros the EU to contribute themselves. The sum is part of the EU budget and is therefore supported by all 27 EU states - not only by the governments of the euro zone. Title: European Financial Stabilization Mechanism (EFSM).
• In addition, the Luxembourg financial quarter, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), headed by German Klaus Regling founded. The EFSF is a limited company with the 16 euro countries as shareholders. It is entitled to receive money on the capital market and the means then pass on (to return) any bankruptcy candidates. She has not yet done, Ireland is the first case. Otherwise believe than the public, the Treaty on EFSF is unlimited. The term ends no 2013th • Approved the
EFSF were first EUR 440 billion. Since respect the special purpose vehicle of the Lord Regling but it needs to get from the top AAA credit rating agencies, and since among the guarantors and the weak currency countries are (Actually a joke), must be guaranteed the bonds issued to 120% and also must have a cash reserve to be provided. Therefore be considerably less than the 440 billion to provide. On the current state only 255 billion! And if as Ireland or Portugal or Spain fail as a guarantor, then increases of the (still) stable countries attributable fraction. Because of this, the Bundestag, in May could not know how much he charged ultimately the taxpayer. If Italy and worse, Germany has to guarantee about 226 billion euros - almost twice as much as the government believe the members of parliament made in May.
• Also on board is also The International Monetary Fund. He had pledged up to 250 billion €. Since the United States in the IMF have a blocking minority, they have for the first time a say in affairs of the European Monetary Union - an embarrassing result, given that the Europeans wanted the euro to the dollar and thus offer the American financial hegemony Paroli. Problem: As the IMF has promised to plan down to the Union's loan half (hence the original cost estimate 500 + 250 billion) because of the EU but now are only 315 billion (60 + 255), and the IMF contribution shrinks to Euro-stabilization. Namely 157.5 billion. Thus a total of 750 billion to available but only 472.5 billion. That they may only go for two or three years, can work out any yourself. Portugal would have to cope with likely also Spain, Italy anymore.
• Regardless of EFSF EFSM and were shortly before the Greek government promised in order to avoid bankruptcy loans that flow now and about 5% interest rate must be. A further 9 billion for Athens will grant the finance ministers of the euro-zone soon. then transferred in early January. Sacrifices for Greece's sovereignty and submits to an EU economic dictatorship - a parallel to the Weimar Republic, whose empire Bank sat the representatives of the victorious powers to see the Germans on the fingers. As Greece is to repay the loans ever, no one has explained to us.

The government deficits are only part of the problem
Given the debts that were before 1999 and piled up since then in the euro zone, the 472.5 billion in an emergency but a drop in the ocean, the end of 2009, Ireland was at 104, 6 billion euros in debt, Greece with 273.4 billion, 559.6 billion with Spain, Portugal with 125.9 billion and Italy with 1760.7 billion - rising trend everywhere. Not change the pledges anything. By 28 November decided rescue package Ireland at 85 billion (Irish contribution of 17.5 billion), the Irish national debt will double rapidly. Explosives, the public debt of Spain: The maturing debts and current deficits added together, the figure for 2011 estimated funding requirements of just under 200 billion (about 18% of GDP) and for 2012 of just under 150 billion. Spain in 2011 required significantly more money than Greece, Ireland and Portugal put together! With each emergency credit continues to increase the level of debt, and its operation is more difficult not easier. Thus, the bankruptcy is more expensive, the longer it is delayed. And the above figures refer only on the national debt, not the debt of the private sector, including banks, representing countries such as Ireland or Spain, the bigger problem. The national debt is but one aspect of the gloomy picture. The euro-zone lies far not only in a sovereign debt crisis, but also in a private debt and banking crisis (in the case of Ireland and Spain) in a housing crisis, the United States exceeds that of their explosive nature still. And will always lied, deceived and beautifully spoken. Already the European bank stress test in the summer was dubious and incomplete. It was intended to calm the markets, which has for a short time then it works. Even the ailing Irish Banks have passed the stress test! As in Ireland a "bad bank" was established, the National Assets Management Agency (NAMA), the Irish banks bought from bad real estate loans claimed that they had borrowed on average 77% of the project totals. Now it turns out that there were around 100%. Investors in turn were more suspicious than the Nama. They pull their money out of months of the Irish banks, and so they drove the crisis to a head. It threatened a very old-fashioned run on the banks and thus the collapse of the financial system.

The debt reduction as a "mission impossible"
What kind of a currency that must be saved permanently! And how? Remain substantially the following ways: rigorous cost-cutting measures are already underway in Ireland and the European South. The intention is not to reduce the debt, but to let him grow more slowly than he would grow without the interventions in the social system and without tax increases. Even so, the effect is deflationary and depressed. After all, the following reasoning is correct: for example, Greece would normally depreciate by 30% in order to be competitive again. Since this is the abolition of the drachma is no longer possible, should - in order to achieve the same effect - falling prices and wages by 30%. Only thus creating a vicious circle: the cost-cutting measures allow the economy to shrink much further in order to fall in tax revenues, and the government deficit is growing instead of diminishing. In response, the government would save even more, but that they can only to a certain degree, to break up social unrest and create a revolutionary situation. Under these circumstances, a reduction of the debt a "mission impossible", the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung wrote on 22 November. Nothing to add. At best, the observation that increase in the European periphery, the anti-German resentment already. The Germans are seen as a disciplinarian, who condemned the debt countries to years of depression and misery. The fatal the euro is that it has raised social tensions which now threaten to escalate to interstate conflict. The early warning of euro opponents, he would divide the EU rather than welding together has proven to be correct.

The cost of a transfer union are out of control
The second solution, favored by the EU Commission in Brussels, consists of an accelerated expansion of the Euro-zone (or the EU) to a transfer union with a financial compensation, which between the German states is similar. Such a leveling of the European standard of living equivalent to the very logic of Europeanism, the logic of centralization and uniformity. Then the still solvent taxpayer in the core area bleed just to the periphery to retain the €. The cost could be huge. "If it should be reflected in the debt crisis of the transfers," said Holger Steltzner 30 ". There is no limit or control more» October in the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
is not quite sure whether the Federal Constitutional Court would play there - nor how far to go, the Merkel government dares. For a real transfer union implies the ruin of the German government finances, and hence the future of pensions. At some point, would rebel, the German Michel. And yet to him the taxpayers in the Netherlands, in Finland, Austria and France. Especially France, the second-largest guarantor of € parachutes tend usually not to pay the bills of others. Conclusion: In order Insolvenzverschleppung and denial of reality is currently a mix of austerity (in Ireland and Southern Europe) and practiced in hard-repayable loans.

Italy would be the absolute emergency
The third solution consists in the fact that some € members resign voluntarily, with their new currency to devalue and to slash its debt as part of a bankruptcy. Exactly the fear the financial markets, hence the sale of Greek and Irish government bonds, which mirrored the rise in interest rates unaffordable level.
is certainly true that with a withdrawal of the bankruptcy of the candidates would get € Once air. But what if wiggling Belgium and Italy? The Berlusconi government is virtually impossible to act, the urgently needed structural reforms have not addressed, and public deficits must be financed increasingly from abroad because the domestic savings is insufficient. In the 90 years before the euro was adopted, Italy was already before the bankruptcy. Italy and its debts are now certainly too large to be "saved." One can only hope that the financial markets as possible long look away and ignore the gradual worsening situation in Italy for a while.

"An insidious process," writes the NZZ
The most elegant, even if present would be an improbable escape from Germany leaving the monetary union. Then the new German mark would immediately add value, and the rest of the zone would get exactly what he needs: a devaluation and the restoration of its competitiveness. But as reluctant to act without principle, Berlin Paris, France would follow suit. The result would be the splitting of the Euro-zone in a hard-and soft-currency block and thus in a north and a south-€. The German Exports would suffer temporarily, the German domestic economy would be strengthened, the high external value of the new currency would yield a sort of social dividend. A walk would not, of course. The splitting of the euro would shock the markets and the global currency markets hard. Understandable, then, that governments fear such an option. Moreover, the question whether France would be more likely to match or North to South €. There is no panacea, it does not, only the choice between different evils.
remains Either way, the situation for the foreseeable future is extremely dangerous and unpredictable. A 'depressing experiment, "called Beat Gygi the European Monetary Union in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung "of 20 November - and the euro "untested construct." Not even with a kind of fiscal Union could correct the flaws of the monetary union. "Probably, one should remember that the countries of the former rather \u0026lt;D-Mark-Blocks> could form a useful euro area," wrote Gygi. As it stood since the weaker countries from a long ordeal, "the force will cost much." Conclusion: "The Insidious in the whole process is that it gradually is going on and that the centralization always apparent success brings."

The moment of truth is only postponed
"If the euro fails, it fails Europe," declared Angela Merkel. This is nonsense, because the EU is not the same as Europe and because the euro-zone does not even cover the EU. Especially the most solid EU states are present: the Czech Republic with a debt of 35.4% with 41.6% of GDP or Denmark or Sweden 42.6%, not to mention Norway and Switzerland, are out of zone and the EU feel very comfortable. All of these currencies will survive the € and get away with it - in addition to gold - for German investors in considering the need to reduce the risk of their portfolios.
that our analysis is far too pessimistic, can be read even from a full-page review by Professor Otmar Issing, who on 11 November in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung published. As long-time chief economist of the Deutsche Bundesbank and the ECB, Issing is unverdächig to want to speak ill of the euro. He wrote that a transfer needs can be justified either socially or economically, that will be formed against a creeping expansion of the transfer as soon as resistance "within and outside Parliament", that little hope exists, "that the community has really learned from the crisis" ; that the current discussions on the reform of the Stability Pact, "nothing good promise" and that the outbreak of a new Crisis "in the not too distant future" is programmed. The article ends with the warning: "The hour of truth is just postponed."

a black Sunday for Berlin
When, on Sunday 28 November, the finance ministers of the EU and the IMF agreed the 85-billion package for Ireland, decided the same, other measures to save the €. The financial markets reacted skeptically, although the ECB had stepped up its purchases of euro government bonds currently playing. As on 28 November was adopted, amounts to a heavy defeat of the Merkel government.
• Still on 23 November, Angela Merkel, the participation of private creditors on any debt rescheduling required. You will not "paradise" to allow for banks, which remains the risk to 100% of tax payers. Five days later it was decided in Brussels that the creditors may be involved only in 2013 and then only in extreme cases, if a country is insolvent in fact - but not in case of liquidity problems. De facto reserves the EU to define the event of insolvency, as they see fit - that is not possible. No more talk of it, that the banks have been going from 2011 to the risk. •
was buried the hope of German tax payer, that of the theoretically established in May rescue in the amount 750 billion remains. He reportedly was due to expire in June 2013. Now, a permanent crisis mechanism to be introduced, called "European stability mechanism" (ESM). The euro crisis is a permanent condition, Berlin loses control as the main financier of the process. By the way: Have all the euro finance ministers decided on 28 November, yet, the term of the loans to Athens (a total of EUR 110 billion) of three to extend to seven and a half years. Fearing that it bursts, the Euro-debt bubble is inflated more and more. What should make

investors
We must imagine the Euro-drama as a rising and falling, years of crisis, with no end in sight, but it can also suddenly turn into a collapse of the currency of the financial system and the bond markets. Specifically:
• Ireland was forced to request financial assistance, although the government was liquid and was thus no urgent need for financing. Purpose of the exercise was to prevent the spread of the confidence crisis in Portugal and Spain. This will most likely not succeed. should
• The next country Portugal in the firing line - with the risk that Spain still. The government in Lisbon is only funded until the end, after which they must return to the capital market. Portuguese and English government bonds with longer maturities (approximately two years) should be avoided. The countries still enjoy a AAA status with a stable outlook: Germany, France, Austria, Finland, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. The owners of Greek government bonds have to adjust to a moratorium and rescheduling, in which they will lose a part of the capital, perhaps between 30 and 50%.
• At least on the currency front, 2011 will run very volatile. The recovery of the euro in September and October has turned out to be illusory. Now he is back under pressure. The players will wait and see the outcome of the elections in Ireland early in the new year. Yet it offers The U.S. dollar is no convincing alternative to the single currency. He is at best the lesser evil. Currently, the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Bank of expansive than that of the ECB. If it were not so, the euro would be even weaker. Much depends on whether the second round of monetary expansion (quantitative easing) in the coming year, terminated or renewed. The latter is expected if the U.S. economy does not start. Either way is 2011, the monetary policy of the U.S. central bank, ie play the extent of printing money, not just the dollar, but for the price of gold an important role.
• Rightly European bank stocks are suffering from the euro crisis. Also two Years after the height of the financial crisis, the banking system is not rehabilitated. Bank shares are a risky investment, as long as it is not clear, will be affected when and to what extent the Institute of debt consolidation in the euro zone. The monetary sector thus involves a risk for the more stable European stock markets. That the German stock market is relatively good, also thanks to the below-average weighting in the financial sector. Uncomfortable by the way the situation is the Swiss National Bank. She sits on high euro positions. If the Euro collapses facing severe losses, and the SNB can only hope that thanks to rising gold prices and a corresponding increase in the valuation of their gold reserves to compensate. Over a similar risk compensation have also those investors in the euro area, which have risen a greater treasure.

Alter Ego Hair Products

The errors of the EU accession

of dipl. ETH Max Salm

first Say
assertion: In the bilateral approach would need to Switzerland as a non member of EU rules on companies in which we could not join in the development phase.
This statement may well be legally correct, in spirit it is totally wrong. For Make non-EU member Switzerland has not a single EU law, it is not acceptable. Our negotiators and the Swiss people in the event of a vote, it is completely optional a bilateral contract agreement or disagreement. This right we have but no longer, if we were an EU member. As an EU member, we only have a say in theory. Because, first, Switzerland has only one of 27 voices and secondly, the decisions not taken in the EU Parliament, but in the Commission, where the Swiss influence is minimal. Switzerland is the non-member is clearly a stronger position.

second EURO instead of francs
Claim: With the euro, we would not have the problems with the high Swiss franc.
Here one must ask: Is the high Swiss franc really a problem for Switzerland? Since we are in our country have absolutely no raw materials and also about 40 percent of our need to import food, the raw materials are cheaper by a high Swiss franc. This will help our export industry. In addition, a significant proportion of our exports to non-European countries is used, so that not all the EURO rate-misery affect our exports. As the development of the economy since the crisis since 2009 and the EURO price collapse shows our industry was able quickly to find new customers outside the EU. In the short term caused by the high Swiss franc well problems in the export industry, but innovative companies in the future could and can always find long term solutions.
addition, the EURO, and since all experts agree is a bad design. It is not possible a conglomerate of countries with such different economies such as Greece or Denmark, or Holland, and Poland to tie with a common currency. With state of their own currencies, the money flow between the different economic structures are controlled quickly and effectively.

third Foreign trade
Claim: The EU is our main trading partners, so we have to be there.
actually went Until recently, almost 60 percent of our exports to EU countries. Such a bias is always harmful, because it makes us vulnerable to blackmail. Already as a result of the recent crisis of 2009, our economy has successfully sought new markets and found one. This is the better solution as a candidate.
addition, Switzerland has been since its industrialization associated with the whole world. Even today, our authorities can negotiate to operate the export trade with all countries of the world trade agreements. As a member of the EU, we should limit ourselves to the EU's trading partners. It is very unlikely that the EU should build only because of trade relations with any country Switzerland.

4th Security
assertion: Switzerland is too small to successfully care for their safety.
Every day we receive via the media of proof that small people with their militias, with minimal armor, can beat the best professional armies in the world. The Afghans have to do the most powerful army in the world (Soviet Union) and thrown out of the country right now the Taliban are about the same with the most modern army in the world (NATO). In addition to foreign partners
is unreliable. Although England and France in 1939 because of the associated with them the Nazi Poland declared war, but the Polish independence could not save them. And in the peace talks in Yalta, the Allies Poland have passed without a fight Stalin. And today, 65 years after the war, including large parts of Poland still with Russia.
Srebrenica was protected by UN troops, but they could not prevent thousands of innocent people were murdered. Only those who can protect himself, has a chance to survive. A militia army, whose members know every stone in their own country, has finally won forever. And that's no different today. What we need is a militia army, prepared for the defense of our own country, and not an army that can lead all over the world, combined with other armies of war. And it takes the will and the determination of all. Unfortunately, shows many of our elites that determination no longer exist. And therein lies the problem.

5th Democracy, neutrality
statement: Our democracy and neutrality can persist despite accession.
There is in the EU legislation some open spaces that can exploit the Member States. But this freedom every day less. A referendum or an initiative is not in the EU. The European Commission, our neutrality, when will they ever do away without telling us. Thanks to its neutrality, Switzerland was able to stay out since the Congress of Vienna from all wars and humanitarian work on both sides of a conflict.

6th Size
assertion: Switzerland is too small to compete as an independent state.
The penchant for size is the hallmark of the modern manager. But almost all have suffered with their megalomania shipwreck.
few years ago, said the Feldschlösschen boss his company was too small to survive. He sold the brewery to the big Danish company Carlsberg. But today Feldschlösschen is in big trouble, meanwhile, flourished about 250 small and micro local Swiss breweries. The history teaches us that size does not protect from destruction. Thus, the great Ottoman Empire or the Roman empire that stretched from Africa to the Scottish border, perished miserably. Why is that? Such a large structure, and since the EU is one of them today are only in the form of a dictatorship to govern. And in all dictatorships, the top boss so far removed from reality that he is constantly wrong decision or no notice what happens in the lower ranks. The most recent example of this is the world crisis of 2009. The Little Switzerland has weathered the crisis better than all the large and powerful states.
A small structure is compact and can be much faster and more targeted response to external disturbances than the large ones. And that's true even if our direct democracy sometimes slows the policy significantly.

7th Switzerland as a special case
assertion: Switzerland is not a special case, they must open up and adapt.
Welch nonsensical statement. Because once the political characteristics are:
a) Switzerland is the only country that has a functioning direct democracy, can show the people's rights of initiative and referendum. Therefore, Switzerland is the country with a minimum of strikes and civil unrest.
b) Just as unique is the federal structure of the state. Which is due to the peaceful coexistence of four cultures and four linguistic regions. In all other countries of the world there are insurmountable problems of minorities.
c) The unambiguous and clear separation of powers, legislative, executive and judicial powers, is the Switzerland of an estimated worldwide legal certainty.
d) The Federal Constitution is still valid today, Switzerland is committed to neutrality and is ready, this neutrality with a large militia army which is strongly rooted in the people, to give Nachachtung. The Constitution requires that every healthy citizen makes military service and must always be ready to be called up for military service, that every man has his gun at his house. Unfortunately, many of our politicians are out to undermine these constitutional provisions. There are many economic and geographical characteristics that make it clear that Switzerland is a special case.
e) More than a third of the country rock and ice, and neither to live nor suitable for agriculture. This must take into account the figures for the population density and the pricing of agricultural products.
f) Switzerland has the only country Europe in general no mineral wealth. The people have to earn all prosperity with their own work.
g) The Swiss work, the only one in Europe, more than forty hours per week. This is one of the important reasons for the higher wage levels and prosperity in Switzerland.
The desire for opening to the outside world runs an open door. Since the industrialization of Switzerland, international trade relations and maintained for about 150 years ago called our hotel owners welcome guests from all over the world.
Whenever a EU rules must be adopted, the EU Turbos call for accompanying measures. Switzerland would be no special case, this would not be necessary.

8th Cherry picking
Claim: The Swiss always want special treatment. National
says Luzi Stamm: "I firmly believe that we are not \u0026lt;Rosinen picken>, but that we instead constantly \u0026lt;Kröten schlucken> am. L> The seven contracts \u0026lt;Bilaterale only the dossier \u0026lt;Specifications Handelshemmnisse> and possibly \u0026lt;Submissionswesen> for Switzerland is positive. The other five files are negative for us, including \u0026lt;Personenfreizügigkeit>. Also from the nine bilateral agreements II, most dossiers to our disadvantage: Schengen, taxation of savings through to the ridiculous Dossier \u0026lt;EU-Pensionierte>. If you want to talk about 'benefits' that we bring to the EU, of course, particularly noticed the billions for the NEAT significant that we build of course, not for domestic traffic, but can the EU through traffic. "
Switzerland is well the best contribution to a Europe afford the future if it remains what it is: a model of a small state that has the power to unite different cultures and languages, thanks to the federal base structure and a democracy that is based on actual participation. •

Source: Supplement to mediawatch.ch (www.mediawatch.ch), No. 175, December 2010. Mediawatch.ch the information of the Swiss Association "Media-panopticon."

Golean Cereals In Australia

advocates the destruction of Christianity

It is a carefully planned and designed by brainwashing, and a simultaneous de-Christianization Islamization of Europe is underway. The production is Talmudic / Pharisaic by the New World Order, a stated purpose is to hoard wealth and power for a small elite bankers at our expense. For 2000 years, powerful forces are trying to drain the teachings of Christ and in practical religion to convert them into a political instrument within specified policy framework to transform and distort - having incorrect description. Many ministers are so confused that they simply nothing more of Christ's teachings are but victims of centuries-old highly organized anti-Christian influences.

This anti-Christian influences are rooted in Gnosticism, derived from the Pharisees in Alexandria. They targeted the mixing of the doctrine of Christ, first with a Greek humanist philosophy, then by Islam (Knights Templar) - where they wanted to make man his own savior without supernatural intervention. Today, the world's religions are mixed by the Talmudic / Pharisaic New World Order in an inedible, humanistic Goulash, by the Talmudic / Pharisaic new world order that all and has forced everyone to obey by bribery / threats, serving to pacify gullible citizens of the world dictatorship under the NWO.
The chief priests seem to the UN, member of the NGO Lucis Trust, which originally was called Lucifer's Trust (Alice Bailey) to find. For his missionary purpose of the Trust "The Great Invocation" composed, used, inter alia, when the World Council of Churches, in cooperation with the UN's annual International Day of Prayer for World Peace at their "one all-embracing God" for the World Peace held. This has now been replaced by Christ, "the coming". It is of Lucis Trust said that call a World Teacher, the Christ some, others the Maitreya, some of the Mahdi, the Messiah and the Jews come back, sometimes. But he is said to be the same teacher - and he's only a teacher - not the savior. For man can save himself and an ascended master is!

Warm Masterbation Oils

attack on democracy

From Federal Ueli Maurer

Voltaire once said: "I may condemn what you say but I will defend my life that you can not say it." This is the lupenreinste democratic spirit in a nutshell.

One must own strongly considered, one must question and criticize other opinions, but we must prohibit anyone's mouth. For every white Democrat, a democracy can function only when two conditions are met:

First, the citizens have the opportunity to form an opinion. Second, referenda are unconditionally accepted and implemented.

independent thought

That's the basics of democracy. In Switzerland, each was supposed to be familiar. I deliberately say "should". Because I'm concerned about our democratic values.

There are forces in our country who are opposed to free competition - they want the free competition of products and services . Abolish The aim for our prosperity. But there also seems to forces that want to eliminate even the free competition of ideas and opinions. And that takes direct aim at our democracy. For

can form an opinion only, who has the opportunity to hear different opinions.

Democracy is the marketplace of ideas. This goes back to ancient times. On the market place, goods were traded and exchanged views. This developed into the political debate and self-determination of citizenship.

Everyone can make offers on the market for ideas: opinions, ideas, solutions. And anyone can check the deals on to question the advantages and disadvantages. Anyone may consider and decide for what convinced him most. And the idea, which then finds the greatest support, the idea is acceptable to a majority of which is made by then.

In our country there is a tradition that people openly discuss and form a clear opinion. That was already the old rural communes. And that was guaranteed in the first Constitution of 1848: freedom of press, freedom of association and right to petition to protect the open debate.

Since then it has the force of law: freedom of expression. Freedom of assembly. This is also in the current Constitution. Only the reality is unfortunately different.

No single case

riot designers fight the free speech and open political debate with threats and violence. We seem to have authorities that are struggling to enforce the constitutional order - on to our rally, 2007, during the attack on our General Secretariat in Bern 28th November.2010 and during the ban attacks on our delegates' meeting in Lausanne.

The action against the SVP is not unique. The self-proclaimed "tolerant" are intolerant quickly when someone has a different understanding of tolerance. Dissenters are to be addressed immediately targeted.

The program "Arena", for example, gets a new leader because the former sympathies have been accused for the SVP. The proximity to the SVP of course, is invented, but apparently there is already a violation of political correctness when one of the interests of an exciting and controversial discussion from time to time considered the strongest party voters.

we look to Geneva: A newspaper is a journalist now and not in the big sing along chorus. The media blow immediately to the attack. In the name of openness and tolerance, he will be tried as a heretic.

This trend worries me: If critics will not be met with arguments, but with threats of violence, bullying, then that free competition no longer plays of ideas. And that is nothing more than an attack on democracy.

referendums implement

The second prerequisite for a functioning democracy, the implementation of the plebiscites would need in our country with its long and successful tradition of democracy, be a matter of course.

The reality, unfortunately there too different. It is worrying, as referenda are derogatory comments, if they turn out not as do the certain circles.

those who dismiss the real problems of the citizens as diffuse fears, among them is that they are irrational or paranoid, and thus incapable of a reasonable decision. This is simply arrogant. And quickly then the step is made, the very principle to doubt the majority of the people.

Because even writes the "NZZ", which sees itself as the tide of liberalism, the people were themselves to blame, if now getting to the decision to expel initiative of the discussion about limiting the right of initiative, new food - in other words, this means that you People, You can go vote, as long as you take a vote as we wish. If you decide otherwise, we will remove your no democratic rights.

living democracy

I wish the democratic understanding would be in that part of society, who sees himself as the elite this country understands better anchored.

I appeal to the democratic conscience of all those who - is hardly counted - search for all kinds of reasons to ignore the popular will: Beware, set the cohesion of our society at risk! Watch out, you undermine the very basis of our freedom and our prosperity!

And I also see the responsibility of the SVP for Switzerland: Our country needs a political force that ensures diversity in the debate and defended the rights of the people. Our country needs a political force that makes for a vibrant democracy!

Ueli Maurer

speech to the party the SVP on 4 December 2010 to an open field in Gland (VD)

Basketball Cupcake Pull Apart Cake

As in Europe, the civil rights abolished

WikiLeaks: Free travel for arbitrariness - How are placed in the case of Julian Assange civil rights suspended

Udo Ulfkotte

If you have read the following lines, then you can convince themselves that Julian is currently not in Europe Assange treated differently from human rights in China or Burma. But unlike in the case of imprisoned civil rights in distant countries, we look at all Assange how the rule of law in Europe is a farce. The persecution and disenfranchisement of the Australian WikiLeaks-founder in Europe is above all a test case of how serious European politicians are still with civil rights. Assange was indeed arrested at the request of the Swedish prosecutor with the valid since 2002, the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) in Great Britain. But this EAW is now one of the most dangerous tools in order to silence unpopular people in Europe or have even disappeared in cells - even if the persons concerned have never committed a crime.

All over Europe people are being prosecuted - just because they support WikiLeaks founder Assange. For those who come to the attention of the police, it is not just the one the websites of Amazon, Mastercard and other companies have made the Internet with DOS attacks temporarily inaccessible. It extends to information available to us from security sources in Brussels now, having set up a Google Alert for Julian Assange or WikiLeaks to get the attention of the European security authorities and should be considered as potentially "suspicious." To avoid misunderstanding: No one claims that there will be against the background of Google Alerts an arrest or search warrant. But those who have set up such an alert will certainly not suspect that their interest is just saved automatically to the security authorities and is known (regardless of Google's participation). This development is part of the degradation of civil rights in Europe, which is simply not perceived by many.

On closer inspection this is all more than questionable, as familiar to citizens of European law can be undermined quickly legal. This proves the "Julian Assange case." Assange was arrested in Britain for a "crime" that in Britain - unlike in Sweden - not a crime: sex without a condom. The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) will open in Europe since 2002, the arbitrariness of the door. There is no legal review of the EAW in the alleged criminal acts. Worse: An EU citizen can arrest and be extradited to another EU country, even if the alleged offense, where he was arrested, is no crime. The EAW leads to absurd situations: As EU citizens can be arrested because they have such as the Internet critical of immigrants who commit often in the EU than EU citizens certain ethnic crimes. Who for instance, in Austria or Germany on the Internet on crime by immigrants is expressed, which can be for example in Sweden wanted for arrest because of "racism" - and suddenly the police arrive at the door and delivers the person without a judicial examination of the case in Sweden .

Imagine, it rings at your door and arresting police officers with an EAW because it was ten years in another EU country once their accounts are overdrawn. A joke? No, not at all. Jacek Jaskolski is a 58-year-old high school teacher of Polish descent who has been teaching since 2004 at a British university. In 2008 he was arrested in London because he was a decade previously coated with a stay in his old Polish home had an account. In Poland this is a criminal offense and is prosecuted in the UK are interested in possibly civil courts for that. Although Jacek Jaskolski had balanced the account has long been covered again, he was by EAW arrested and transferred to Poland. More than a thousand Poles are arrested per year in other EU countries with an EAW and delivered to their home country because they then eventually have their account overdrawn. Each year, Poland will accept in other EU countries to arrest about 5,000 citizens for "crimes". Most of these cases were prosecuted in any other EU country. According to British newspapers, the cases in which an EAW is issued in Europe more bizarre: A 16-year-old teenager was searched by EAW warrant because he had paid in a restaurant but the meal, but not the subsequently filed dessert. The EAW was then detail all the substances and their Value listed, which were contained in the pudding. The boy was flown in specially for the transfer of offenders chartered plane from London to his home in the process - British police were stunned not only about the money.

is more often used, however, the EWA is to make silence politically unpopular people for a longer period. Julian Assange is not unique. Many media do not seem the slightest knowledge of the EAW to have to win by a further instrument of arbitrary additional field: the European determining arrangement in criminal matters (EEW). This example also includes an EU-wide search and seizure decision. Each EU country can use the police in another EU country to order in another EU country - to have carried out a house search or seizure - without any judicial checks. This regulation (European Evidence Warrant - EEW) is his January 2009 entered into force and has introduced until January 2011 in all EU countries. Each local police department, a judge in an EU country, every attorney and every law enforcement agency may issue such a European search and seizure decision (2008/978/JHA EU decision of 18 December 2008) in another EU country. As with the European arrest warrant check the relevant EU country no longer the legality of the decision, but simply out of this. It is a sure-fire system to destroy unwanted people quickly - because they can fight back, however until the measures have been completed and they may have been transferred to another EU country. In the case of Julian Assange we have seen, can have far-reaching consequences of what these measures.

The Swedes, meanwhile, has caught on once to prepare for the delivery of the Australian citizen Julian Assange to the U.S.. This is only the consent of the British. In Sweden against WikiLeaks founder investigating prosecutor, Marianne Ny, announced in a press release, the British would have to agree before Assange can now be delivered quickly to the U.S.. So it's certainly not right and certainly not about an alleged rape - it's just a matter of making a people ready. But that is the farce of a law. Europe has given up. If you are interested in further background of this development, then you look around the rest to our information service.

They are then quickly find what you withhold the "quality media" of information. Those who, like Hans Leyendecker (the man was once renowned as an investigative journalist for the Süddeutsche Zeitung) these days clearly against WikiLeaks position and its founder Assange are currently clearly eaten up by envy because they do not get, but other information, views, and may publish. Leyendecker people like to talk much, "of" conspiracy theory to discredit what they themselves do not get either of information or understanding to interpret. People like Leyendecker would do well to retire to withdraw. Or they are at last and defend political prisoners as Assange. Otherwise "quality journalists share" as Leyendecker once again a clear sign of why they are in today's increasingly redundant and one of the "quality media" should be located where they belong: in the paper.

Animated Wallpaper Vlc

priority order in the gender equality offices

on feminism and women's true stories

By Barbara Steinemann, State Councillor SVP, Watt ZH

Periodically publish the Gender Equality Bureau of the Federation, the cantons and the cities of its information brochures. The one devoted to three-quarters of its pages to the school leavers, where teaching is made more palatable in a typically male-dominated profession.

"Break the traditional gender structures on! Learn a man's job! "These calls are accompanied by a portrait painter and a lot of arguments with All kinds of colorful emancipation. Frankly: The thought of a fringe group of the same sex are to me as a reader almost embarrassing, our society it is probably a little too well.

girls and women appear there as the "stupid sex," which state agencies must have for every situation his way. If we women about being left behind? Do we need a tutor? Or do the same work-site channels simply do not know what to do with their time and their ample public funds?

Islamic oppression

In our neighbor-dominated culture, the exact opposite. The oppression of women achieved in Arabia and Africa new dimensions. The recent reports by the UN to speak of emerging "gender apartheid". The South Africa of today with veil. The new victims are placed in dark clothes and stigmatized beyond recognition. Barbaric punishments and rituals, from stoning circumcisions accumulate again in the Islamic world. Girls are not worth anything, it counts more than their retail value as a bride. Women awaiting execution by stoning for adultery. The case of convicted Khayrieh in Iran has attracted international interest when her pleas were announced publicly: "I am ready to be hanged, but they should not stone me!"

Today waits Sakineh Ashtiani for months in the same country for their stoning, allegedly had contact with the widow of two men. For this she was sentenced only to 99 lashes, which punishment has been enforced.

"right" or even "justice" in these worlds are no individual claims of the individual against society and the authorities. Meanwhile, we should always be aware. So the woman will be killed, simply because they can defend themselves as a woman at the worst, however. The mystery of this injustice should draw us into its spell, not the agenda of our gender equality offices.

The West, however, is silent. In Saudi Arabia, women are hardly treated better than Camels. They may not have a passport or driving a car, they are education, occupation, deprived of even public spaces - just like the blacks in South Africa.

defend anyone but themselves? Greenpeace thinks about the whales, the Green Party to climate change, the feminists of the female apprentices in male professions. To protest against, may be as idle as the world history of the omissions. Nevertheless, if the dozen dictatorships withdraw the women's human rights is demonstrated by the systematic Looking away from indifference, fear and indifference.

And us?

want to Western Europe, immigrant Muslim women here all too often under the Yoke of their men. All too often - in fact locked in her own apartment - they are at the mercy of hard violence, many have become victims of forced marriages, the starting point for a non-free life predicament.

Where is the outcry of women's rights organizations? Find it breathtaking to equal opportunity office, the language? One in the Middle Ages left standing "culture" makes in this country wide, gender defamation already impressed the external appearance - in the form of more or less of the concealment of the body. The Equal Opportunity Office look away. Admittedly, it's also easier to brand Swiss men as bearded tyrant to correctly state.

Muslim-specific issues can be explained away so little: Other in Switzerland could ask the questions we raised last year by the initiative. You have not done it until now. Before you say loose flaky and chumming, Islam is a part of Germany, one should look at the disgusting facts that take place in Muslim areas in the eye and raise this open. Violence damages the image of Islam. And as long as the Muslims who live here do not distance themselves from such atrocities of Islam, they did not arrive in our democracy.

priority order

An ethnic discrimination all around us far from it. We do not draw the line between Muslims and all others, but we draw the line between those who live by the rules of the liberal constitutional state and those which adhere to the archaic doctrine of a backward tradition. We have always done and do it in the future. The population of Switzerland has also seen this so, otherwise they would not have voted Yes a year ago.

While breaking the women's representatives and equal opportunity offices in Switzerland, the head every day about how the women have something similar could be made and in which administrative body or to set up a women's representative expert body would be immigrants from areas greater distance and suppresses even greater cultural distance in the middle of Europe systematically.

particular, feminists and those political groups which take the matter of women, human rights, violence against the weak and ignore social issues, precisely the phenomena of Islam, which they usually fight with verve. That just to support the advance of Islam in Europe mocks any reason. The refusal of Western freedoms for Muslim women met a key condition for the winning ground human rights obligations, parallel societies. Misogyny occurs in migrants to apply the multi-cultural tolerance bid, say critics ban. Although these are to foreigners!

The most terrible human rights abuses on our planet are the local women's offices not worth a single line. The website of the Equal Opportunity Office of the City of Zurich instead lets us know that this year the prize of twenty thousand francs Diversity Award to the association "Women City Tour Zurich" will be directed. The city of Bern wants to reduce gender-based discrimination with a new action plan "a city without advertising sexist motives" prevail. This is expressed, according to what priority order, the same place gutters treat women fates ...

The migrant backgrounds are Official bodies such taboo, because reality does not fit into the ideological concept of multiculturalism. In order to accept the gender equality offices, not only thought control, they tolerate severe pain that is done to other women.

Barbara Steinemann

Polaroid 600 Film Substitutefujifilm Instax

No Islamization of Switzerland!

passive response to Federal
manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland"
National Ulrich Schlüer, Flaach, ZH

On 29 November 2009, decided the People and the minaret ban with a clear majority. For one year from the Federal Council is expected opinion of how they will implement that referendum. Three times required advances, and events such comments. Three times more The Federal Council.

a written reply to interpellation would eliminate any obligation of the Federal Council, as he had them put in order-handling in the mass on the agenda of the special session on crime reduction. When the interpellators resist the attempt disposal, they simply disappeared from the agenda.

facts

The action brought by Geneva Muslims to the European Court of Human Rights for the purpose of the cancellation broke the Swiss referendum on minaret ban and a solicitation from the Federal Council. This doubted but on procedural grounds the jurisdiction of Strasbourg. The Federal Council but avoided any assertion that according to Swiss constitutional law, no court of a decision of the Swiss sovereign has the right to overturn. Instead, signals the Federal unconstitutional willingness to continue not only Swiss law, but also provisions of the Federal Constitution as subordinate to international law to be classified. For such a devaluation of the Federal Constitution lacks any legal basis.

The Federal Council - by its constitution that instance to implement the referendum would have - remained idle, as a State Government approved a minaret, although the state government declared a year ago, the immediate application of the minaret ban and this is based explicitly on pending applications has. The Berne building permit for a minaret in Langenthal the state government plans - to intervene rather than under constitutional mandate against the vote offense - left to the decision in federal court, although under the Federal Constitution to correct any court for a basis of a valid recognized popular initiative taken decision or reverse it can. The Federal Council is moving outside the Constitution.

end of the observation phase

Egerkingen The committee, which launched the initiative and minaret ban enforced in the voting campaign, the Federal Council has given a full year period to implement the decision of the sovereign at last. The Federal Council let the deadline idly pass. Egerkingen The Committee is not waiting any longer. Today, exactly one year after the Yes on minaret ban, it becomes active again. It presents the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" as a guide, as it is implemented by the People and the adopted minarets.

principles of the Manifesto

The Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland" is based on the fact that Switzerland is a Western country on Christian foundations. Those who move here can be added to respect this - where is each resident in Switzerland Full range of religious freedom guaranteed.

The minaret has nothing to do with religion, however. It is a symbol of the socio-political Islam, which is guaranteed in the constitution opposes basic rights and freedoms. Therefore, it is against the sovereign. The prohibition expresses that the democratically established legal system in Switzerland is compulsory for all residents of the country. proceed as long as Islam instructions to the Muslim faithful, are contrary to the fundamental rights of freedom, Muslims may only become naturalized if they confess in a statement formally to the unconditional respect for the Swiss Federal Constitution and the principles set out in their rights and obligations. Muslims who refuse to integrate, The residence permit will be revoked.

oppression is not tolerated

-Muslim oppression, ie headscarf and veil coercion, violence in the form of punishment, revenge, stoning, but also calls for such violence have no place in Switzerland. Neither polygamy nor forced marriages, not marriage by proxy or in accordance with the marriage of minors to the Swiss legal system. In a free country like Switzerland, citizens express their personal, independent thought with an open face. Face veil does not belong to Switzerland.

All are equal before the law

The distinction between "pure" and "impure", resulting in claims for burial in "pure", ie Christians free soil are derived in breach of Swiss law. Anyone who demands such has to bury their dead in their home country.

The banishment of Christian religious symbols from public buildings or Christian traditions or from school (Christmas) is misplaced. Compulsory education is fully applicable to both sexes and for all the teaching lessons.

*

This, in brief, the principles of the Manifesto "No to the Islamization of Switzerland". Who are the Federal Constitution, who the Fundamental rights and freedoms in our Constitution seriously understands the manifesto as a foundation for a free Switzerland free people - as it has been given to us by our ancestors.

Ulrich Schlüer

Treating Scabies With Capsaicin

Gender mainstreaming - feminist indoctrination

gender mainstreaming in elementary school
tax money for sex-indoctrination

By William Villiger, Eggenwil AG

The re-education project "Gender Mainstreaming" was launched in 1995 by the international women's movement in Beijing as a gender equality strategy.

Not only the UN has written on gender mainstreaming in its agenda, the project was 1999, incorporated into EU law (Treaty of Amsterdam). Since then tried to implement gender mainstreaming for the guiding principle for the actions of the administrations of all levels across Europe.

is in this context that the order of the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) to the College of Education of Central Switzerland (PHZ) to build up a competence center for sex education. There is already working on the curriculum models that will then be incorporated in the curriculum 21 - and thus also in the classroom. As gender mainstreaming is a comprehensive and targeted strategy is applied, which aims to sustainability, it is obvious that even the "more malleable Children targeted by the project operator will be taken. Moreover, the time from Perspective of gender mainstreaming promoters now cheap: HarmoS curriculum and 21 are seen as excellent opportunities for the Switzerland-wide introduction of a gender-compatible sex education.

goals of gender mainstreaming

gender mainstreaming as a strategy of equal opportunities policy asserts that there is any area which is not influenced by male or female behavior patterns and values. The gender role behavior is culturally constructed, that is learned and therefore changeable.

future there is the freedom of a new "gender justice" among educated people, his race and his sexual orientation free to choose to decide that is personal and arbitrary, if he or she wants to be male or female, heterosexual, gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual. From the perspective of Teacher Education of Central Switzerland are already four years old are defined as sexual beings, and the eleven-year schooling (HarmoS) is targeted for gender-oriented influence be used on children aged four to fifteen years.

Legal framework

does The Center for Sex Education with a totalitarian claim: The objectives of gender mainstreaming sex education be simply explained as non-negotiable, by appealing to human rights. To circumvent possible opposition from the Cantons, uses the Federal Office of Public Health of the democratically legitimated poorly Education Directors' Conference (EDK) and the curriculum 21, which will be introduced by decree, with which he is not capable of referendum. By "targeted and strategic lobbying» 1) is prescribed by the above re-education program for parents and democratic control over and are smuggled into the classroom.

characteristic is this: The gay organizations sit on the advisory board of the Competence Centre. The parents but to be denied any influence on events in the classroom: "The legal and administrative separation of HIV prevention and sex education in schools should be repealed. They should be taught as part of a mandatory unified curriculum "..

frontal attack on the family

has always been the bourgeois family, the Marxists stumbling block: How locates Friedrich Engels in the patriarchal family organized the "first class opposition," which must be overcome on the way to a classless society. The new SP-party program to find the sentence. "Who wants human society has to overcome the male" The SP is oriented toward intellectual fathers of the '68 revolution ("Frankfurt School"), which the destruction the "authoritarian family" pushed it forward with the goal of "sexual liberation". Gender mainstreaming is now radically works by the youngest is yet to be taught that the natural mapping of man and woman is only "seemingly natural".

In Switzerland, the marriage but to non-matrimonial relationship priority due to their outstanding importance for the state and society. It is therefore constitutionally protected.

The expansion of sex education (biological aspects) on the sex education (social aspects) in addition to special educators, school social, school mediators, school psychologists, another line of work is created: An army of self-styled "sex educators" will haunt the future with missionary zeal by the school buildings and the young people teach what they know either long or do not want to know. These sex educators do presume to arrogantly invade the privacy of children and families and the ethical, moral and religious value orientations of parents to undermine. They want to force children to take part in events (class hours, projects, school theaters) - dispensations are excluded - where intimate things are discussed in public.

teaching

The Center for Sexual Education sees in the center of school sex education, the "self-determination of the child":

self-determination of the timing and choice of partnerships and the form of life;
self-determination and autonomy over time and number of children and their right, on aspects of sexual and informed reproductive health to be and to use their services,
representation of the equivalence of different sexual orientations and identities.

reduced Obviously, the sexual morality of this so-called competence center on the use of rubber and pills. Lawful and good is all that the child feels himself said as pleasurable or interesting and what has been partners with any "negotiated agreement". The main motto raised self-determination of youth is clearly aimed at the parenting responsibilities.

The fact that the teacher of a country are to be taken to task for propagating a particular ideology that blends into totalitarian states. In the democratic Switzerland, this is a monstrous task. Since the introduction of compulsory schooling is its ideological neutrality. A requirement that should be in the classrooms now advocating a state-authorized, permissive sexual morality, gives the Cultural Revolution of the so-called "sexual liberation" a new dramatic dimension with unforeseeable consequences for society.

Since the Federal Constitution of the traditional family explicitly assigns a special status, has such a hierarchy must be reflected in the educational system: the young people in our schools are replacing the concepts of gender mainstreaming, rather the conditions for success, the benefits and the state-preserving power of the millennia-old way of life "family", will be presented.

We demand that the family-destructive agitation of the Federal Office of Public Health and the College of Education Central Switzerland and its focus on gender mainstreaming to be stopped. Though tax dollars should be used then to build a "Centre of Excellence for Genealogy." The colleges of education should be instructed to appoint working groups with designated family specialists, who work out principles for the education and training of incumbent teachers and teachers for the education and training of teachers at teacher training colleges.

William Villiger

Can Tech Deck Cause Caner

Nature Park Strategy

nature parks - a neo-liberal EU project

by Erika Voegeli

nature parks are not a Swiss product, but an EU import items. They fit seamlessly into all strategies of the neoliberal globalists to the dissolution of nation states. Privatization is a keyword in the country of resources and public scrutiny of states and municipalities should be withdrawn. Entbürgerlichung citizens would have a second read, for privatization of a part, and supranational structures on the other hand, create new private-sector influence and decision-making beyond the state-guaranteed political rights, which are to be whittled down because of ever-smaller areas of influence.
The EU itself is a prime example: Fewer laws are passed by elected parliaments of the nation-states, instead, they are not created out of 27 commissioners elected by the people - under the influence of 15 000 well-paid lobbyists of economic and financial groups who maintain their offices in Brussels for this.
will host the Nature Park Strategy, including a program of the European Union to "rural development" because the countries of the EU are behind areas covered by such projects. And just as in the nature parks in Switzerland, they are also in environmental protection, economic development, promotion of labels for better marketing of local products, tourism promotion, job creation, etc. PR-touted moderate. If

is controlled "from the bottom up" from above
is a fact that nature parks on a site of European Commission figure as examples of so-called Local Action Groups - local action groups. This form is read accurately, "the main supports for the implementation of the Leader approach." 1 This entirely non-local, but developed by the EU headquarters approach used by the action groups to implement "to their development strategy and finance. These strategies are the promotion of Public Private Sector Partnerships created and set a multisectoral, from bottom to above is the approach one, which local cooperation and local networks promotes. "2
The action groups are in turn part of national networks that incorporate everything from This development is involved. Merged all is the European Network for Rural Development (European Network for Rural Development ENRD), responsible for effective implementation of EU development programs for rural space.

appetite for use of rural resources
The EU's interest is not unfounded, after all correspond rural areas in the EU 90% of the territory ", and rural development is a vital area of policy. Agriculture and forestry remain crucial for land use and management of natural resources in rural areas of the EU ... "3
Solo the fact that the so-called local action groups have different structures (Leader, National Network, European Network) are finally coupled to the policy of the EU Commission to punish the entire representation lies. What at the municipal level as a local action group comes along, posing as a strategy from the bottom up, turns out to be the last link of a staged the Brussels strategy that presents itself as the promotion of local concern to citizens to suggest, but in reality to Brussels standards and regulatory influences which may prove to be a network of pitfalls and costly court proceedings for the local economy.

"harmonization" - Cover term for elimination of the citizens and centralization
As the dissolution of national boundaries is being driven, presents itself more specific on the page "Regional Policy European Union" under "natural park with no barriers." Because the landscape is a "geographic unit" fancy that had this "separation" by breaking down the barriers - and therefore national government structures, the "harmonized" would be - reversed werden.4 harmonization - a typical spin - means: What has been the law assumed by municipalities, districts, cantons and states, was intended as dissolved and in the example of nature parks on the decisions of such public - private - action groups and associations are assigned, which are connected through the appropriate networks or financial dependence on EU requirements.

dismantling of democracy - not Swiss way
Looking at the development of nature parks in Switzerland, it is found that the approach is virtually the same way. The - empty - Brussels drip missing though, he is replaced by funds from the federal treasury. And this is exactly analogous to the Leader-Strategy public communities involved in a private club, which then forms a new layer that is - and this is crucial for Switzerland - Cut off the direct democratic influence, it creates structures that are ultimately removed from the political control of the population. Well, in the case of nature parks to rate the voters of each affected communities of accession to the park contract - that was then but the last time the procedure is otherwise similar to that in the non-democratically elected Metropolitan conferences and unite in the urban areas of the midlands: decide where Executive members of the participating cities and municipalities have programs for this region - although this constitutionally established power of the federal and cantonal constituent political bodies is, as such, the political right - are - referendum and initiative. It creates another with such bodies, not constitutionally defined, not constitutionally recognized level that ascribes to decision-making powers, which allocated federal and cantonal constitutions clearly and are not available. This is not democratically controlled intermediate level produced or copied - in combination with other such bodies, and sometimes with individual departments to federal agencies that promote such initiatives, in the case of natural parks in the responsible Federal Office for the Environment - policies, regulations, ordinances, etc., in analogy the process in the EU.
The concept that Make private "quasi-governmental organizations" state tasks pushes back the state and initiate its gradual privatization. Here - without a formal EU membership - at different levels of structures tinkered, who, along with other places could fit into neo-liberal concepts. For instance, when the appetite for "land use and management of natural resources" to the financial possibilities of privatized infrastructure or water resources depends.

financial enticements from euphoric times
Switzerland needs at least not such concepts. And certainly not to in times of economic stress, as in the development of such structures money flow, sometimes a lot of money, such as for feasibility studies or the like. In this case, these projects were developed in a time when still plenty of money flowed into the federal treasury. Meanwhile show the shocks of the financial and economic crisis, its impact: The current federal revenues will be significantly lower. And probably the capacity for this park projects for financing more expensive design and feasibility studies already exhausted, there would be any additional costs to be borne by the municipalities and cantons.

Back to reason
nature and landscape are with us for decades maintained and protected. When it really about the promotion of rural Areas is: How would it instead, with a reminder as to the investment support fund for mountain areas? This fund was recently boosted by paying about 1.5 billion francs. This countless interest-free loans have been funded for infrastructure buildings and communities are paid back reliably. This fund has now been disbanded in the new regional policy - to finance the payments of the federal government for park projects from this? But this time without repayment. Until the fund is empty? And then? If the communities of their duty? Or we will sell off our living space to private investors?
we reflect back on ourselves, on our own Values and experiences. Solving us from the mistaken belief that anything new is inherently better. Switzerland has made with the investment support fund best experience. How about instead of destroying democratic EU projects with a revival of the genuine Swiss and truly sustainable solution?
And by the way: Uri would, for example, with its folk theater in which the school children to the Chief Magistrate the valley participated and were met with the visitors to enthusiastic applause, to offer something more autonomous and more meaningful, as an EU copied parking regulations and other additions for the Label vast salad. Besides, such initiatives also give opportunity to young people with meaningful activities let us begin to teach them history and general knowledge in addition to their importance to the community and the common good, instead of leaving it to the mindless cultural degradation of the American way of life.

a leader stands for "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économie Rurale", which means "the links between rural economy and development actions."
2 http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/rural-development -policy/leader/en/leader_home_en.cfm)
3 http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/rural-development-policy/introduction/en/introduction_home_en.cfm
4 European Commission. Regional Policy European Union. Natural parks without barriers (Pdf.)

Template Dora's Backpack

Nature Parks - expropriation rates

give "No more restrictions on our freedom," Different communities
"nature parks" a rejection
thk. The protection of and care for nature in the responsible people in Switzerland of course. One will hardly find someone who is not of this opinion, and therefore it does in our country the way it looks: a cherished environment and a high awareness that this landscape is the foundation of our lives. For the people engaged in agriculture, it is clear that one must never be their own livelihoods, destroy the land, but to its receipt of generations must be assured. No farmer is driving over-exploitation of his country, is finally to be the greatest asset.

Direct democracy does not need a "nature park"
the more absurd it is when cross to be built on Switzerland called natural parks that are already guaranteed by the protection of a nature and landscape protection highly controlled environment. With positive terms such as "protection of our environment," "Living Together", "Park communities connect," "future itself make" and the like - the whole expression is reminiscent of the jargon of the Future Workshop - to the citizen with a positive attitude towards the "nature parks" caused.
is On closer inspection, however, that this is satisfied we already all without "natural parks", particularly in the communities: the protection of our nature is all a big concern, together we make citizens have always shared, individual communities have evolved from always come together to resolve pending issues and problems together, and a free citizen in a country with direct democracy to make its future together with his fellow man himself always

we like to sell our country to tourism?
In the areas that belong to a nature reserve, live, people in villages or small towns to practice their Career there, operate a business and go to work every day. The term park is completely out of place and suggests something quite different. Since when is defined as the habitat of humans as a park or even park? The argument is
tried again and again, tourism and the distribution of any label that aim to ensure economic prosperity in the communities. Do we want our communities to really target only a tourist bubble and thus sell our country to a whatever kind tourism? It is our habitat, and first and foremost we need it to live happy. Mind you, the label assignment is for the federal government. These are the guidelines of the EU, which we submit should. Who met in a park communities can thus be taken more to the apron strings. Nothing of "Shaping the future itself." The opposite is the case, we will dictate to people how to make them more in the future, their environment and especially to not have make.

"... not to let soap of beautiful words,"
In several towns that lie within a nature reserve, perimeter, there have been recent vote. In this case, the citizens of the affected communities decide whether to join the so-called park association and thus endorse the park concept do. In
Oberhalbstein area and in the Albula in the Grisons was Some communities on the Parc Ela tuned. Two of the 21 municipalities which are to form the Parc Ela, voted against a candidate so far, additional votes are pending. If you
with individual citizens were there got to talk, to listen to different arguments. But mostly outweighed the concerns that it is not clear how big the development rights and restrictions in agricultural use are of the soil. The argument of the proponents that the accession no change and can therefore be accepted without hesitation, could not convince the communities in Riom-Parsonz and Tinizong. A resident said therefore: "Why do we need a park, if things remain, as it is? "The restriction of local autonomy, coupled with the loss of direct participation, engaged citizens. "Why should we accept a contract that is in the set do not even realize what they can and can not afterwards. We must not let the soap of beautiful words, or we have lost our freedom. "

serious concerns and observations
In the cantons of Uri and Nidwalden and Obwalden is about the constitution of the" nature park central Switzerland. " There, too, will come in the next few weeks to more votes in each municipality. Engelberg is the community from the project dropped out before the "Park Agreement" to the vote has submitted. As expressed by the municipal administration, was there was in Engelberg from the majority of stakeholders and tourist organizations' concerns and critical opposition. " In a communication from the council it is stated inter alia: ". Other concerns were primarily in the area of any future protection as well as the demarcation issue of the park perimeter in Engelberg» On demand was learned that the park contract not here is clear what impact it had on the construction law and landscape protection, which today is already very strict and had prevented the recent creation of a new ski slopes. According to the local government had the people's decision On the withdrawal from the "park project" supported, and the issue was now off the table.

"The park central Switzerland is not tangible" There
hope of a return to reason not only the example of the two communities in the area and Oberhalbstein in Engelberg, but also the vote of the municipality in the canton of Uri Gurtnellen. Although the council calls for joining the "Nature Park Central Switzerland", had voted against the majority of the community's financial contribution of 11 000 francs and prevented the membership of the park association. At the community meeting itself, it did not look like the result. There were hardly any votes against it, but it was brought to all issues. That was the end the majority, however, shows that the questions were well answered hardly satisfactory. subject to further restrictions need was not for the citizens of Gurtnellen imagine. Same reluctance also entertains the local council of Beckenried, advocating a rejection of the park project. In a statement, he notes that the council "further discussed thoroughly with the park project" was. He came to the conclusion that was "not the natural park Urschweiz tangible". "It remains unclear what additional requirements and limitations such a nature park will bring."
goes on to say, "the political community would in future be free of additional restrictions and conditions ". The Mayor clarified: "It is for every community has a different situation, one can not decide for others, the superior, each community for itself whether it wants to. But we can not advocate for our community. "The concerns expressed herein are entirely justified. IT IS, for example, after the park regulation of the League under Article 20, paragraph d: ". Existing impairment of the landscape and townscape of buildings, installations and uses [are] opportunity arises to reduce or eliminate"
Therefore it is clear how much agency a single municipality still owns.

If "park Unions" constitutionally permissible?
The community autonomy and broad political participation, the key characteristics of Swiss democracy, may not be a club regulation sacrificed at the end, the citizen does not allow more participation. After joining the church in this club is no longer the decision-making authority at the local residents, but at a parent association, through which the executive members of the community residents without representation decisions. This raises serious questions whether the state law is ever permissible. A responsible management of our country and our landscape In the interest of all, it needs to ensure no "nature parks" à la EU, but free and self-determined citizens.

Davids Bridal 99 Sale Blog

EU dictatorship

EU dictators drive centralized economic regime ahead

The despotic EU octopus is preparing to intervene directly in the fiscal and financial policy decisions of the member countries and the markets through a command-based economic government of the controllability of the European tax-slaves and the value of to convince Euros

Propagandafront.de, 29.10.2010

While government bonds by the EU's public debt debacle, the worst-affected countries once again shaken threatening countries try the EU bureaucrats, the crisis for their goals of a centralized government economic advantage and to drive a consolidation of the political decision-making powers of Brussels.

French President Nikolas Sarkozy and ökomaoistische representative of Germany, Angela Merkel put in creating an automated punishment mechanism for the euro-zone countries, which do not respect the Stability and Growth criteria is the propaganda spear tip, go with the globalists in the battle. Merkel called for in May this year, all the sinners of the euro-zone deficit to vote to withdraw, of which 14 of the 16 euro zone countries would be affected. After Merkel's proposal then Finland and Luxembourg had the exclusive shots.

The state mass media and the group because of their essential function - to act as Propagandaarm of States and the shadow government - of course, entirely on the side of the globalists. This is exemplified in a comment in the Vienna daily Standard delivered today to the expression: "This does not change the fact that Merkel is quite right in the matter ... The community needs members can keep hard on a leash to prevent a second Greece .

The Bilderberg EU president Herman van Rompuy said after the EU summit yesterday, discussed at the action to "stability of the Euro", were in respect of a Abstrafungsmechanismus for wasteful governments of euro-zone countries:

say "Some people to be disappointed about the fact that it no longer 'automatic' would make a decision. But more 'automatic' is indeed exactly what we propose! The finance ministers will decide on the basis of the so-called inverted majority of sanctions. This means that a Commission proposal on sanctions as long as endures until a qualified majority vote of dissent ... The Finance Minister is required by the contract and can not be abolished be "

the dictatorial and undemocratic EU Commission. - which is currently about the financially anyway already suffering people tried in Europe to impose a package of direct EU taxes, so as to increase its federal power, and the EU budget budget this year on the grounds of the importance of further expanding its tasks again - can thus adopt as they see fit once sanctions on sovereign nation-states would need to be then abgeschmettert by the majority of countries in the aftermath.

The existing measures and the new demands by the European Commission, France and Germany reflect the exact plans of the senior Against Nazis, who called the concept of centralized European economic dictatorship in the 30s and 40s to life. This idea was then pursued by the Fascists and Bank Star of the Bilderberg mafia and in recent decades taken up by the addition Ökomarxisten and globalist EU technocrats. The Austrian newspaper reported

the press that said van Rompuy ". We have to strengthen the constitutional establishment of the Treaty" the Treaty of Lisbon is in fact a constitution that the European man has been imposed. France and the Netherlands have conducted referendums on the European constitution, with the result that their populations, they refused. Later denied the Irishman from the new constitution. This was now called the Lisbon Treaty - but this time without the word "constitution" in the "text of the treaty." The

could not accept the Eurocrats and globalists Sun The Irish prime minister and member of the Trilateral Commission, Brian Cowen forced the Irishman with the despotic EU dictators with the aid of a terrible fear and shock campaign in a second vote, where the Irishman then approve the contract. The EU Treaty was then in December 2009.

now use the EU bureaucrats and all the supposed real crises as well as the undemocratic powers obtained the "dictates of Lisbon" to consolidate their power. In addition to the advances in the direction of a direct EU tax, it is currently on a massive expansion of the external representations of the "United States of Europe", in the pretensions of the new EU Ambassador to the United States, Vale de Almeida, found their recent peak . The whole thing is coordinated by the despotic tyranny of "Baroness Catherine Ashton, the EU's new high priestess for foreign affairs - this is also a by the dictates of Lisbon launched Office.

Propagandafront.de also reported on the efforts of the To access the General Assembly of the democratically legitimated, ultra-dangerous, civil and human anti-United Nations, a further attempt, the power of the new globalist administrative unit to consolidate and EU despotism solidify even after the outside - European Union - as the new state.

do now to save the Brussels terrorists so the euro and make the European economy "more resilient". In the press paid by you clarify the Bilderberg Despot van Rompuy states:

"... the creation of a new macroeconomic monitoring framework. This is the biggest change. It will detect imbalances and risks, such as real estate bubbles. It will monitor the competitiveness of Member States. If a country have to lose too much competitiveness, measures are taken, especially within the euro zone.

As I said before, the euro has worked as a sleeping pill, just in good times. We are now proposing a system of timely awakening. This will strengthen the trust "

confidence in dictatorship in power and neo-Stalinist centralism -. So it can certainly be the U.S. central bank, whose mercenaries torturing people, or the Chinese central bank, whose henchmen women in the 8th Month of pregnancy forced to have abortions to impress, but no private investors who are fleeing injustice whether this European country instead with gold and silver, rather than to buy government bonds from the euro zone.

People should make better no illusions about it. The European Union had already before the Treaty of Lisbon on state and federal powers. Since the Treaty of Lisbon is the EU is a flawless state! One of the most prominent constitutional lawyers in Europe, Professor Schachtschneider, carried out on the Treaty of Lisbon:

"The Treaty of Lisbon, the Union once a federal state. The duties and powers of the Union go far further than about the federal to the countries in Germany. It denies the federal structure of the Union because she should not be a state under the Basic Law and in accordance with the constitutional laws of other Member States. A state that has such as the Union on the tasks and powers of existential rule must be democratic. This original legitimacy could, as I said, giving only a European covenant people. The Union State has the latest on the Treaty of Lisbon also has far-reaching federal state typical competence-competence. It can not only expand its powers in the interest of achieving goals without the participation of national parliaments (Art. 308 TFEU) and is not only authorized to levy taxes Union (Article 269 TFEU), but claims for himself in the "simplified revision procedure" of Article 48, paragraph 6 of the TEU, the authorization, as well as the entire treaty in whole or to change in part (except the foreign and security policy) by decision of the European Council. The need for national parliaments to agree only if the Constitution stands in their laws. In Germany, this is not the case. Bundestag and Bundesrat may submit only comments that should be considered, but need not be considered care. The authorization to simplified amendment procedure is nothing but a dictatorship constitution. "

The UK Independence Party (UKIP), one in the European Parliament, seated party of Great Britain, which has been mandated by their British voters to abolish the EU or to help provide an outlet England states to the EU also all elements of the rule to be established. On 27.10.2010 was the UKIP MEP David Campbell Bannerman of EU foreign priestess exactly that criticism. With regard to the newly created EU Ambassador and the giant bureaucracy in tow Bannerman said:

"We believe this is an unnecessary, disruptive and wasteful complement the work of the national embassies. I press it times as compared to From them: The real reason for this unnecessary duplication is to allow the European Union, the fourth and final element of the definition of a nation state under the Montevideo Convention met in participating interests to take part in diplomatic relations "

In the Montevideo Convention. it says this:

"The government should as a subject of international law have the following characteristics: (a) a permanent population, (b) a defined territory, (c) a government, and (d) the ability to relate other to connect states. "

Every patriot must deal with all his strength and peaceful means for the immediate and complete abolition of the despotic and anti-democratic EU Dictatorship use.

What Is The Song In The Commercial With Bellanova

Ahmadinejad - the scapegoat of the Western World

Who benefits from the coverage of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?

Niki Vogt

before the UN General Assembly, Iranian President has once again provoked sent. The Western media in the usual way to jump to this provocation. Really is not dangerous but the comparison of the victims of 11 September with those by U.S. bombing. The religious aspect of these sites is woefully underestimated.

comes in the political debate, it usually does not matter what anyone says. Is often more important, who it says, and probably even when. Positions can continuously be formulated by certain parties. You will find no entrance into the political debate. "The concept of the" spiral of silence that pressure to conform to the mass media has indeed been described for 30 years. The modes of action remain to be the same. Only recently could the observer on the reporting of a scandal at the UN General Assembly. "The agitator on the Volcano" was just one of unflattering headlines in the German press, which is much maligned by the presence of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad employed. Of the one he is revered as a savior, hated by others. For the actual content of the controversial politician is there hardly any space. His appearances before the UN General Assembly for years have been exciting opportunity for a media which is already equal to a ritual staged: friends and enemies.

This is also the end of September, when the taciturn Ahmadinejad some theses for the 11th September was the best. Mind you, nothing of what the Iranians had made no great clarity as to be heard would not have been previously known. Ahmadinejad outlined three possible scenarios of what the events of 11 As for September: The author of the attack have to be a terrorist group which the U.S. had outwitted. This view, the Iranians In his speech, will be promoted mainly by the U.S. government. Or: "The event was staged by elements of the U.S. government for eliciting a change in the descending economic progress and the supremacy of the U.S. in the Middle East and to save the Zionist regime," Finally. "The operation was carried out by a terrorist group, but the former U.S. government has supported this and used "This is how the deliberate provocation. Iran needs to be defined not even know to which view he tends. It is necessary to clarify this important issue if the UN would investigate the incident. The representatives of 27 countries, reported the German press, then outraged, would the UN General Assembly abandoned. Also, because the president's 3,000 victims of 11 I set off September with the victims of the bombing of the U.S..

fact Ahmadinejad stated: "It was informed that on 11 September, when some 3,000 people were killed, what makes us all sad. But to date have been in Afghanistan and Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of people displaced - and the conflict escalates further "provocations have felt this is the aforementioned 27 countries.. Conditions in the UN General Assembly would, however, been described quite accurately, if the German press had said that 163 delegates had been seated and the speech the Iranian president had mostly listened approvingly. This statement has nothing to do with solidarity, but describes everything that isolation of the Western world in its particularity of Europe, which was clearly in a different way at the EU-Asia summit. While China has brought the African commodities market in recent years sent under control, the Western leaders now begging for "justice" and a "free market" which was to secure European access to important sources of raw materials. Also appears reporting the reality, if it is, China is now with the old industrial countries on equal terms. This condition is past. Europe and especially pant, the U.S. the "yellow giant" behind long ago.

And similarly isolated, Europe is also in the developing world to Islam through community. Even secular Middle Eastern states, as was the case with Iraq and Syria continue to watch for is to be under the active assistance of the West turned to religious dictatorships, as it is one of Iran. While Europe and the U.S. fight terror - usually, as is once again in Pakistan, through terror - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad leads a very different, a psychological war, which goes completely in the ritual reporting. Much that is likely to be sustainable, the fusion of faith and politics, that keeps pace with the Muslims entered the UN General Assembly. After Ahmadinejad's understanding of the Prophet Mohammed endpoint of revelation, a kind of completion of the Abrahamic religions. "Parallel to this development, but the servant of the selfish and worldly this clear call made in the way and fought the message of the prophets," the president judge in his speech. These enemies of Islam are just as the secular Europe and the USA. Especially in the third world countries you will hear if the old story of European imperialism is ready: "The territories were occupied and massacred the local people in droves bloody and humiliated. "In the category of these conflicts, he also lined up the last two world wars to the Iraq war in the recent past. And Islam is now the Reconciler within this warlike world are: "He calls for the worship of One God, justice, love for people, cultivating the earth, reflect and defend the oppressed and fight the oppressors to" are the oppressors after. this understanding of the secular states of the West.

"The Koran is eternal, as God and truth are eternal. This step and every other step that leads to the deepening of fissures and separating distances between people are devilish nature. You have to wisely careful not to slip into Satan's trap. "In such sentences is the actual explosive force. For according to the understanding of Islam, peoples and nations play no role because they have to submit to the great community of faith community Umma. So there is real peace in the mind of Islam only when Islam has evangelized the world. The respect that brings the Iranians against other books of God, is not worth much. There is after his own understanding of Mohammed's prophecy at the end of the chain of transmission, although there may be respect for Christianity are theoretically available. According to Muslim idea but only the Koran is relevant, the Regulation also affects the company in general. The problems of such states as Iran is not in uranium enrichment, but in the access to people through religion. Europe is currently just under Islamic rule.

A Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who is from the west by the undifferentiated and demonstrably mendacious reporting made a martyr gets by a state and an importance for the long term. The damage that should be assigned to him by false translations, insinuations and allegations, acts only in western countries. And only as long as the mainstream media can make that claim without objection for lack of corrective.