by Dr. Bruno Bandulet
zf. In his latest book, "The last years of the euro," Bruno Bandulet sets not only an explanation why the euro has no future. He also looks into the question of the ideological and political reasons to make a failed policy of EU Europe from the beginning: an ideology and a power structure that does not conform to European traditions. The following excerpt from the 6th Chapter of the book is a chapter with the heading forward, "The power structure of the European Union." There Bandulet refers to a newspaper article of the former judge at the German Federal Constitutional Court and German Federal President Roman Herzog in 2008, in which the decisions the European Court of Justice (ECJ), including the so-called non-discrimination, sharply criticized and summarizing put it: "The cases described show that the ECJ deliberately central principles of Western judicial interpretation and systematically ignored, decisions based unclean, the will to go the legislature or even turned into its opposite, and invents legal principles, which he can lay back on later decisions based. They show that the ECJ undermines the competences of the Member States themselves in the core areas of national jurisdiction. "This ties in with the following text.
was significant that two of the Duke of examples of EU non-discrimination came into play. The 2009 came into force the Treaty of Lisbon was known initially as the EU Constitution. Articles 2 and 3, you can still take in the strange values of the EU elites insight.
is different than in the basic law of God no mention. Instead, a cultural revolutionary alternative to religion constructed and hung on undefined phrases like pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance and solidarity.
The EU committed itself in Article 3 to "eradicate poverty" not only in Europe but around the world (to go like that?), And "combat social exclusion and discrimination." Expressly counts them at their values, the "equality between women and men," not just equal rights.
addition to the "Treaty on European Union" (TEU), there exists a "Treaty on the Functioning of the EU" (Treaty). In this illusion of equality and the desire to re-educate Europeans to macro-and gender-neutral people to visit even more enjoyable. According to Article 8, the Union "in all its activities" out inequalities "eliminate" - as if this represented not the charm of Europe and the spice of life. In two articles (10 and 19) to "discrimination" (again and again that keyword!) discrimination on the grounds of "sexual orientation". The EU eliminated the distinction between law and morality, it breaks with the cultural heritage of Europe, it is the way to a new totalitarianism.
behind the Treaty of Lisbon, a kind of European Constitution, one may suspect a hidden agenda, or - that would be the more benign interpretation - it is seen as a mere absurdity.
the Lisbon Treaty explained as Hans Magnus Enzensberger at a ceremony in Copenhagen on 2 February 2010 is likely, in addition to the experts who have it worked out, have not studied each European citizen. "This has a very simple reason," continued Enzensberger, "it resembles namely, a wire entanglement. I suspect that this is in keeping with its authors. "
The general lack of interest is unfortunate, because transparency is a proven means of domination. We should already know to what legal principles, we are governed. After all, has long taken in Brussels and a European arrest warrant, the extradition of a citizen to a foreign State, for example because of unpopular opinions expressed even allows if the crime in his own country in general is not punishable.
is worth reading also Article 66 of the FEU Treaty, under which the "Council", ie the competent Ministers, on a proposal from the Commission after "consultation" , the ECB "certain protection measures" against "capital movements" to or from third countries impose. This makes it possible to stop in the event of a severe currency crisis, the freedom of capital movements, as well as transfers to Switzerland. Then, the citizens and investors to inmates of the EU zone. Such protective measures may be imposed for a maximum period of six months, a small consolation. You would then just be extended for another six months.
The EU is not the Europe that we wanted. The fact that this would be no alternatives, is a lie, and almost a prohibition on thinking.
"that 40 000 officials, including their propagandists should decide who is and who is not a good European, "is a rather abstruse idea Enzensberger said in his speech in Copenhagen. Since the 40 000
build no roads, maintain schools, neither the external nor internal security concerns and produce nothing, they must be redeployed. They distribute money and emit an unprecedented flood of orders, regulations and directives that are stacked up to at least 150 now 000 pages. "No way they expect," said Enzensberger, "that we ourselves know what is good for us, this we are in her eyes too helpless and immature. Therefore, we must are cared for and thoroughly re-educated. "
Because everything is under the primacy of equality, harmonization, centralized and redistributed. That the freedom in Europe to choose between different currencies, not fit into the concept makes sense. Ad personam is the commissioners and officials in Brussels done anything wrong. What they do is by the political class in the main cities wanted and tolerated. •
Excerpt from Bandulet, Bruno. The last years of the euro. A report on the money that the Germans did not want. ISBN978-3-942016-35-3
0 comments:
Post a Comment