The history of the Swiss school
The Swiss People's education is unique in its kind. It takes many forms, adapted to the specific needs of the people, the landscape and local history. Direct democracy has influenced the design of the school system. No distant authority could decide on the desk, as the future generation has to learn. Yet since about 20 years to surreptitiously destructive influence exerted on the schools. Not least, democratic institutions are gradually bypassed. In the article below is traced the development of the school, highlighted its strengths and problems are identified.
rl. First a note to school in a democratic community: Because is sovereign in a democracy of citizens at the same time, it must be formed large. To the pedagogical goal of general and peripheral formation of "head, heart and hand" (Pestalozzi), it is also the future role of the student as citizens of a county, a canton and the federal government to be considered. Not a one-sided orientation of education to the wishes of the globalizing economy or to an assumed social change are important, but a sound general education, each is repaired, commune of the community on all matters referred to in Bonum decide.
This formation of "head, heart and hand," is aimed at ensuring that everyone is able to deepen the current political issues to deal in order to decide better. Regardless of his education everyone is encouraged to have a say in the accompanying facts! In other developed everyone who is invited to a say, the desire to understand the decisions ahead. Direct democracy educates to maturity!
be the basis of various historical writings hard to trace the development of the Swiss People's education in a direct democracy. The reader is impressed by the commitment, diligence and foresight, has wrestled with for a good and just school. In the anniversary volume ", the Zurich Public Schools 1832-1932" by 1933, every single step towards developing a functioning school system, both the educational tasks has grown, as well as the claims of direct democracy, described in detail. It means, for example: "As will always be also recognized in 1830 that a democracy of ignorant and Unpolished a lost cause from the outset was. As one of their \u0026lt;wichtigsten Wünsche> the men of one type of Schulwesens> \u0026lt;durchgreifende improvement had demanded. "(P. 8) From the perspective of secondary school teachers in the commemorative" 125 Years Thurgauerische secondary teacher conference. 1857-1982 "(1984) the search for a good teaching described, for example:
The conference" decided in 1860 to make \u0026lt;communications experience on the curriculum as a permanent agenda item of their meetings. That was six years managed so that after a speech about a particular school subject, the discussion began and kept our Trial Lessons and discussed.> "(p. 13)
The teacher training college in 1982 Küsnacht ZH was finally issued a jubilee book, the cover in the motto of her seminar flag from the late 19 Century maps, "public education is the People's Liberation."
has Unlike the European countries surrounding the school system in Switzerland, experienced a very close bond to the municipality and the canton, which is expressed in just such a jubilee volumes. A sign of the roots in direct democracy.
As in other European countries, was recognized as a result of humanism and the Enlightenment, the value of education. Newly joined by the Enlightenment, the idea that everyone is entitled to education. Thus in the first half of the 19th Century in Switzerland, Austria and Germany, a primary school movement, which was supported by many dedicated educator Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, Philipp Albert Stapfer, Friedrich Froebel, Thomas Scherr, Adolph Diesterweg, Karl-Friedrich-Wilhelm hiking and much more to you it was a big concern to implement a broad public education for all. Their commitment was closely connected with the democratic movement. Many stood in opposition to the ruling government in their country and suffered fluctuating fortunes. The princes of Europe were indeed interested in a good education for their subjects - not least to the public welfare and thus increase tax revenue - not, however, to have educated citizens in the country. While it has been suppressed in Germany after 1848, the Democratic People's Education movement, took place in Switzerland a more diverse structure.
In the communities were formed committees that would oversee the schools. As democratically elected school boards were that were composed of citizens of the community. Each community supervision of that authority to teaching, teachers and school buildings. This is also the concern of the community were repealed in the school. Until recently, the parents say in as citizens of a community on the permanent position of a teacher. The governmental and technical supervision was carried out by elected people, depending on the canton in part with experienced teachers (depending on the canton as "Inspector" or "district school nurse"). Overall, the organization was created democratically, slim and popular. Subsidiary issues were negotiated locally.
The cantons set up teacher training and provided for a regular school system. It also bodies (such as an "Education Committee") were selected, which together represented all strata of the population and professionals. No minister expressed via the adoption by the policies of his lobby group.
The teachers organized themselves into "conventions" or met to larger "chapters" or "synods" to their part to make suggestions for improving the school system or establish them. The many lovingly compiled teaching resources are one of the impressive evidence of this commitment.
organized in many cantons, the teachers the school system itself, the teachers selected from the ranks for a limited time, a "head of a house" or "principal", who took over the coordination of the teaching profession. Lesson plans, materials management, most of the administrative burden, but also events beyond school, were self-organized. An independent and thereby more cost-effective Model.
created in the cantons of different education structures, according to the needs and conditions. Today we see the school in Ticino different from the school in the Lake Geneva or in Schaffhausen. Under the federal form of agreements among the cantons and a few federal requirements (eg compulsory education, free education of school or lesson number of the physical education).
Already at the beginning there were attempts to get the federal government to increasingly impact on the educational institutions of the cantons. install with the idea of a school secretary for education ("school Vogt"), the Federal Council in 1882 but failed significantly. The theme was for the first time for long Time from the table.
will try again today at various levels, from the people by centralizing the education system. Recall, for example, the activities of the non-directly elected Board Director (Director of Education Conference EDK) to inter-cantonal level (Harmos, curriculum, etc. 21). The widespread introduction of school management, which are "out" in close contact by the cantonal education authorities, represents a break in the history of the elementary school dar. All these transformations are not Swiss achievements, but come in a roundabout way from the house Bertelsmann1 or the via OECD2 country . They are aligned and power-oriented economist.
Calls Today the reinforcing resentment among parents, teachers, educational researchers but also by a halt to the "reforms" one, not least because most take place "reforms" at the expense of democratic involvement and school quality. It does not, to reflect on the foundations of our school to stop the senseless school reform and increased again to tie at the positives.
1 The amazing talk of "self", "semi-autonomous" or "autonomous" schools have no educational background, but one of power and economic policy. The school as dirigierbare and profitable unit. A significant role in the introduction this concept played the Bertelsmann Foundation in 1995 with broad and free distribution of Scripture: "The future of education. School of the Future, "in which they, the school as a" house of learning "promoted. (Details please, please, how the European scene has come together in the past 15 years, this private sector approach). Not least, the neoliberal ideology of Milton Friedman's godfather was here (in the real economy, this theory with the banking crisis is major flops). After
Ernst Busch was introduced as education director of Zurich "education reform" on a large scale
, he figured after he left as director of
Bertelsmann Foundation.
2, not democratically legitimated body, the OECD, of which Switzerland is a member, now taken over tasks that go far beyond economic issues. Across Europe it is indirectly guidelines for school policy in each country. Who is the OECD, by what right, tasks issued, remains unclear. Sun Country reports are created, we analyze some phenomena or developed educational controversial tests such as PISA. The results are set as goals for that education. Must flow from the developed OECD committees content to the cantonal and inter-cantonal curricula. Many cantonal education authorities felt the flood of increasingly "international" Requirements overwhelmed and got themselves "experts" in their departments. It happened often that a representative from Bertelsmann or the OECD landed in educational administration.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Friday, August 27, 2010
Continuous Heartburn And Nauseated
The destruction of the elementary school
Always at your service, Mr. Principal!
satire (I)
rt. I have been working for four years as a teacher in our school team. I've become a really well-oiled cog in the wheel. At our school always something going on. And since our school has one principal, everything runs smoothly. Decisions are made fast and pulled straight through - no more long endless discussions in the teachers' convention. Our principal says that is good, and he says, as we have to implement the vision - if we want to be an established school - and we all want! After three years, it is really so that no more negatively by disturbing questions or dissent notice.
We jump to our principal at constructive and happy when queue new tasks. We admit to our principals also like to error, because he can finally know after many years in the private sector is not exactly how it works in the school. But his experience in the private sector to bring new life to our school - he also takes the Bertelsmann Executive Board compass to help. We are now supposedly much more effective. Each month we will at least a proposal from the Cantonal Department of Education or the Director of Education conference at! It has begun a new era!
* * *
the beginning it was not as easy for our principals. So I was very happy that he is in his part-time head teacher training module, "dealing with resistance," as he once told me in passing. Since then, he is really going. It is no longer so ugly situations with older colleagues. I have noticed how our principals older colleagues now receives very nice and thanked for their suggestions very welcome. My head teacher told me a wink that it was now "Applied OE". When I looked a little blankly, he added: "Organization Development". Well, I have no idea what is organization's involvement, but my head now grinning so much. Only the older colleagues say each: "Again made a proposal that will disappear without discussion."
We now have only rarely common conventions by which we decide anything. My head says this is resource-hungry! We also have much to do. Each of us is in at least three or four different research groups on education, PISA, Creative Commons, Christmas bazaar, IL (Individualized Learning), playground design, etc. We need to get a job or we look for in a predetermined frame itself an order. Then we work out suggestions that the others will be obliged to, or, if the school administration does not want it, then our proposal is the "standby", it said the elders.
If we then take it all together once, then these meetings are pre-structured content and time accurately and be coached by our principals or from an external moderator, Marlis Weber (Weber School Coaching AG).
We can then write to a selected topic of our thoughts on maps, like when first-graders. The tickets will be fixed to a wall. Then everyone sticks a colored dot on the map, the his ideas is the closest and a speck of a different color on the card that does not correspond with his expectations. Last time we
set us apart with our new school mission statement: "Learning - Shaping - live." In the area "make" there was a violent interaction between our principal and the caretaker. A young teacher had written on her card: "With all the students craft / interior paper airplane and sail over the playground can be." In the question period that comes before the spot gluing, then asked our caretaker, which would have got to do the "make" with the subject. The young fellow that always follow the latest ideas from the teacher education brings to our school, said: "It's obvious, each designed his plane out of themselves." "That's a little bit," said our caretaker somewhat hesitantly. Since my head intervened: "Stop! No assessment of the proposals, which destroys the whole process. I must ask you now to ask only if you know her proposal did not understand. "The janitor mumbled that it was now too stupid to spend the whole day to discuss dots, while the work is and remains at home, students sit. And then he said, all because of such a mission statement that reads eh no! Now nodded our head the caretaker understanding and said he could understand him well, but this is now a very important process for all of us which we believe we do not interrupt.
Oh - now we have worked so well, and then he disrupts the process. Well, that comes in his speech to the MAB - sorry, employee assessment.
He then said no more. But another colleague brought up. She said that she did not even place in order if we stay with paper planes, whereas in the past week, four fights had taken place on the school playground. After our principal had her longer looked directly into his eyes, he was clear: to promote "The new mission statement our \u0026lt;Corporate identity> that strengthens us and our students. You'll see, then there is less friction. Moreover, the order for a mission statement is clearly in the cantonal evaluation report to the school. We have to do. But you can rest assured because of the fighting, as we have invited the cantonal \u0026lt;Präventions-Task-Force>, and the rest, we will implement a prevention program with the consultant team of \u0026lt;Go soft>. "
But the colleague was there and said, quietly, as if nothing had happened. "For three years we have steadily lost classes due to the perpetual evaluation and quality assurance measures and the reed-days (School-based teacher training), which we then glue dots, while the achievements of our students are getting worse and increase the interference in the school routine. Our young colleagues are hardly yet to prepare their lessons seriously.
Each of them has yet to participate in several project groups. We're now on our students there and not for the school "my head was finally direktiv." This is not here, the vessel for this topic. I would not in this context, the "Then he went on a bit more friendly:" Bring your concerns but the next time in your group of classes a "Then did not! more really happy on. Despite this situation, our headmaster was allowed and encouraged us over and praised our proposals.
I heard, as a colleague whispered to her colleague: "Only three more such years with school development, then our young colleagues to functioning command receivers, our school is transformed into a laboratory for organizational development, our students learn less and less, and democratic practices die. But I think the citizens in our community to watch this waste of money and not long to go such types as our principals with their \u0026lt;Mediationstechniken> soon have to. "I think he finds my head ... no need
* * *
I was in the evening after our REED really fix snoozed. We had done really well - despite the incident. In the evening we had several really creative proposals for the implementation of our school mission statement, which we recorded in our five-year plan.
Actually I wanted to prepare the lessons in the evening for the next day, but I still had the record of our subject, "gymnastics" to write, fill in the tandem-evaluation form and manage my e-mail account. That will take some time unfortunately. It makes me sad that I will remain so little time to prepare. My friend says 24 Clock is an end to prepare, or have the students with a sleepy teacher. He's right.
I must be careful that I do not get "burn-out". My head teacher has said, everyone is responsible for themselves, we should have a way with us. The best quote, so good to us in the eye. Our next REED Day under the slogan, "build your own strength - strength to the team!". I am looking forward to it.
At 1 clock 20, I put out the light over my desk after I completed the first part of the questionnaire on tandem evaluation ...
* * *
Students are now increasingly becoming victims of organizational development processes. This development is described euphemistically to "school development". The process extends over Europe. Large corporations such as benefit the Bertelsmann publishing house and control it. Goal of their school is not the mature and enlightened citizens. Here, "glasnost" is required! On the elementary school of the sovereign to decide! •
Permanent School Reform
rl. Since the beginning of the permanent school reforms (in the 90s) the democratic structures are systematically weakened. A key role is played by the introduction of powerful principals in the elementary schools, which themselves operate closely. This is unusual because the teachers their affairs largely governed democratically with each other. Now, without stopping and pushing education reforms passed from the outside via the school management in the schools. There is a permanent organizational development process.
Countless teachers complain that they can hardly find the necessary time to prepare their lessons solid as it ever has additional tasks (eg evaluation) or compulsory training (Super Vision, Mission Statement, etc.) are overloaded.
* * *
How schools are destroying
So ": A majority of the schools can operate with on-board resources or organizational development, for purposes of internal training support to external organization development consultants . Fetch But there are quite a few cases where there are serious conflicts in which it is not possible without external advice. [...] Needs Then it permanent impetus from the outside "
Dalin, Per;. Rolff, Hans-Günter; Book Herbert.
institutional school development process.
A handbook. Bönen 1996th P. 337
Always at your service, Mr. Principal!
satire (I)
rt. I have been working for four years as a teacher in our school team. I've become a really well-oiled cog in the wheel. At our school always something going on. And since our school has one principal, everything runs smoothly. Decisions are made fast and pulled straight through - no more long endless discussions in the teachers' convention. Our principal says that is good, and he says, as we have to implement the vision - if we want to be an established school - and we all want! After three years, it is really so that no more negatively by disturbing questions or dissent notice.
We jump to our principal at constructive and happy when queue new tasks. We admit to our principals also like to error, because he can finally know after many years in the private sector is not exactly how it works in the school. But his experience in the private sector to bring new life to our school - he also takes the Bertelsmann Executive Board compass to help. We are now supposedly much more effective. Each month we will at least a proposal from the Cantonal Department of Education or the Director of Education conference at! It has begun a new era!
* * *
the beginning it was not as easy for our principals. So I was very happy that he is in his part-time head teacher training module, "dealing with resistance," as he once told me in passing. Since then, he is really going. It is no longer so ugly situations with older colleagues. I have noticed how our principals older colleagues now receives very nice and thanked for their suggestions very welcome. My head teacher told me a wink that it was now "Applied OE". When I looked a little blankly, he added: "Organization Development". Well, I have no idea what is organization's involvement, but my head now grinning so much. Only the older colleagues say each: "Again made a proposal that will disappear without discussion."
We now have only rarely common conventions by which we decide anything. My head says this is resource-hungry! We also have much to do. Each of us is in at least three or four different research groups on education, PISA, Creative Commons, Christmas bazaar, IL (Individualized Learning), playground design, etc. We need to get a job or we look for in a predetermined frame itself an order. Then we work out suggestions that the others will be obliged to, or, if the school administration does not want it, then our proposal is the "standby", it said the elders.
If we then take it all together once, then these meetings are pre-structured content and time accurately and be coached by our principals or from an external moderator, Marlis Weber (Weber School Coaching AG).
We can then write to a selected topic of our thoughts on maps, like when first-graders. The tickets will be fixed to a wall. Then everyone sticks a colored dot on the map, the his ideas is the closest and a speck of a different color on the card that does not correspond with his expectations. Last time we
set us apart with our new school mission statement: "Learning - Shaping - live." In the area "make" there was a violent interaction between our principal and the caretaker. A young teacher had written on her card: "With all the students craft / interior paper airplane and sail over the playground can be." In the question period that comes before the spot gluing, then asked our caretaker, which would have got to do the "make" with the subject. The young fellow that always follow the latest ideas from the teacher education brings to our school, said: "It's obvious, each designed his plane out of themselves." "That's a little bit," said our caretaker somewhat hesitantly. Since my head intervened: "Stop! No assessment of the proposals, which destroys the whole process. I must ask you now to ask only if you know her proposal did not understand. "The janitor mumbled that it was now too stupid to spend the whole day to discuss dots, while the work is and remains at home, students sit. And then he said, all because of such a mission statement that reads eh no! Now nodded our head the caretaker understanding and said he could understand him well, but this is now a very important process for all of us which we believe we do not interrupt.
Oh - now we have worked so well, and then he disrupts the process. Well, that comes in his speech to the MAB - sorry, employee assessment.
He then said no more. But another colleague brought up. She said that she did not even place in order if we stay with paper planes, whereas in the past week, four fights had taken place on the school playground. After our principal had her longer looked directly into his eyes, he was clear: to promote "The new mission statement our \u0026lt;Corporate identity> that strengthens us and our students. You'll see, then there is less friction. Moreover, the order for a mission statement is clearly in the cantonal evaluation report to the school. We have to do. But you can rest assured because of the fighting, as we have invited the cantonal \u0026lt;Präventions-Task-Force>, and the rest, we will implement a prevention program with the consultant team of \u0026lt;Go soft>. "
But the colleague was there and said, quietly, as if nothing had happened. "For three years we have steadily lost classes due to the perpetual evaluation and quality assurance measures and the reed-days (School-based teacher training), which we then glue dots, while the achievements of our students are getting worse and increase the interference in the school routine. Our young colleagues are hardly yet to prepare their lessons seriously.
Each of them has yet to participate in several project groups. We're now on our students there and not for the school "my head was finally direktiv." This is not here, the vessel for this topic. I would not in this context, the "Then he went on a bit more friendly:" Bring your concerns but the next time in your group of classes a "Then did not! more really happy on. Despite this situation, our headmaster was allowed and encouraged us over and praised our proposals.
I heard, as a colleague whispered to her colleague: "Only three more such years with school development, then our young colleagues to functioning command receivers, our school is transformed into a laboratory for organizational development, our students learn less and less, and democratic practices die. But I think the citizens in our community to watch this waste of money and not long to go such types as our principals with their \u0026lt;Mediationstechniken> soon have to. "I think he finds my head ... no need
* * *
I was in the evening after our REED really fix snoozed. We had done really well - despite the incident. In the evening we had several really creative proposals for the implementation of our school mission statement, which we recorded in our five-year plan.
Actually I wanted to prepare the lessons in the evening for the next day, but I still had the record of our subject, "gymnastics" to write, fill in the tandem-evaluation form and manage my e-mail account. That will take some time unfortunately. It makes me sad that I will remain so little time to prepare. My friend says 24 Clock is an end to prepare, or have the students with a sleepy teacher. He's right.
I must be careful that I do not get "burn-out". My head teacher has said, everyone is responsible for themselves, we should have a way with us. The best quote, so good to us in the eye. Our next REED Day under the slogan, "build your own strength - strength to the team!". I am looking forward to it.
At 1 clock 20, I put out the light over my desk after I completed the first part of the questionnaire on tandem evaluation ...
* * *
Students are now increasingly becoming victims of organizational development processes. This development is described euphemistically to "school development". The process extends over Europe. Large corporations such as benefit the Bertelsmann publishing house and control it. Goal of their school is not the mature and enlightened citizens. Here, "glasnost" is required! On the elementary school of the sovereign to decide! •
Permanent School Reform
rl. Since the beginning of the permanent school reforms (in the 90s) the democratic structures are systematically weakened. A key role is played by the introduction of powerful principals in the elementary schools, which themselves operate closely. This is unusual because the teachers their affairs largely governed democratically with each other. Now, without stopping and pushing education reforms passed from the outside via the school management in the schools. There is a permanent organizational development process.
Countless teachers complain that they can hardly find the necessary time to prepare their lessons solid as it ever has additional tasks (eg evaluation) or compulsory training (Super Vision, Mission Statement, etc.) are overloaded.
* * *
How schools are destroying
So ": A majority of the schools can operate with on-board resources or organizational development, for purposes of internal training support to external organization development consultants . Fetch But there are quite a few cases where there are serious conflicts in which it is not possible without external advice. [...] Needs Then it permanent impetus from the outside "
Dalin, Per;. Rolff, Hans-Günter; Book Herbert.
institutional school development process.
A handbook. Bönen 1996th P. 337
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)